Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Pretty rich of you to talk about that.Did you think of this username due to <BLAH BLAH BLAH>
Pretty rich of you to talk about that.Did you think of this username due to <BLAH BLAH BLAH>
Whelan!.......Secret of their success?
Its amazing how one continues to learn something everyday.Hi all, I am new to this forum.
For the last five years I have been working on my own ratings system, constrantly chaning the formula, for test and ODI players. I have finaly settled on a formula. I thought I would firstly display my top 100 test batsmen with you, too see what you think. When I have time, I will explain the formula. Until then, see what you think:
TOP 100 TEST BATSMEN
1 Bradman 1447
2 Hobbs 944
3 Ponting 902
4 Tendulkar 874
5 ......
........
97 Nurse 589
98 Faulkner 588
99 J.H. Edrich 587
100 Mead 586
101 Zaheer Abbas 586
No need for that, imo. Clearly Grace will fall short of his legendary status if measured by purely statistical methods, which is what Grace's rankings are based on.Its amazing how one continues to learn something everyday.
My cricket lesson of the day......Dennis Amiss and Slater (amongst hordes of others including one from Najafgarh) are better batsmen than WG Grace (PBUH)
You really think so ?No need for that, imo. Clearly Grace will fall short of his legendary status if measured by purely statistical methods, which is what Grace's rankings are based on.
First of all, likely DOG's analysis only took into consideration Test matches, and Grace was past his best when his Test career began. Thus any analysis of only his Test stats would underrate him.You really think so ?
Would you like to do a statistical analysis that proves this which cant be torn to shreds ?
Its amazing how one continues to learn something everyday.
My cricket lesson of the day......Dennis Amiss and Slater (amongst hordes of others including one from Najafgarh) are better batsmen than WG Grace (PBUH)
Good. Thats all right.First of all, likely DOG's analysis only took into consideration Test matches, and Grace was past his best when his Test career began. Thus any analysis of only his Test stats would underrate him.
Finally, I am much too tired to do anything of the sort.
Not much worse than Sachin's would have been if he was playing in those times and played till he was 68 !!What was his first-class average then?