JBMAC
State Captain
BUT would any of these three batsmen make a "top 10" of all time batsmen? I don't think so.Yeah Hussey is a gun. One of my favourite players to watch, along with Mohammed Yousuf and Kevin Pietersen.
BUT would any of these three batsmen make a "top 10" of all time batsmen? I don't think so.Yeah Hussey is a gun. One of my favourite players to watch, along with Mohammed Yousuf and Kevin Pietersen.
Yes, t'is true. Not quite as bad as Smith and Watson yet though.Has barely posted of late (GCSEs) so am not sure, TBH.
Only Englishman I think anyone could accuse of loving him would be PF - although even there having him in his avatar was merely a result of a WC avatar challenge.
Cheers mateFair effort by Days of Grace - top username too. Seems maybe a bit biased towards the modern day players - maybe someway of factoring in years played as well as, or in lieu of, just total aggregate runs might be the go to weed out one or two season wonders?
The other issue is that while I think you're quite right to boost players pre 1914, there are several other adjustments that could be made in the other direction, probably for the 1930s (roughly) and the last 7 years - slight downgrades to reflect that they were generally batter-friendly conditions more often than not?
Always good to get a new member who can come up with interesting things to discuss, in any case, so welcome to CW!
I don't think that PF was saying they would, merely stating that those are three of his favourite batsman to watch.BUT would any of these three batsmen make a "top 10" of all time batsmen? I don't think so.
That's a great effort mate. Looks very very good. Though I do agree with the others who say that its a tad bit modern-centric. Would love to see improvements when you do get a chance.
Yeah Hussey is a gun. One of my favourite players to watch, along with Mohammed Yousuf and Kevin Pietersen.
Haha. I never knew.Yes, t'is true. Not quite as bad as Smith and Watson yet though.
Did you think of this username due to Arthur Ashes book or see it on Tyson's tattoo?They get an extra 20% if they played their entire careers before 1914 as there is a general consensus that pitches before the Great War were substandard and hard for batting most of the time.
I toyed with the idea of points for runs before finally settling on them, as it stops players who have played relatively little tests, but with a high average, from being too far up the list. I guess its a reward for lonegivity of career more than anything.
.......Secret of their success?Days of Grace said:37 Kirsten 666
38 Jayawardene 666
39 Sangakkara 666
40 Azharuddin 666
Bit of Tyson, bit of W.G, and a bit of the idea that we all need a little 'Grace' in these times.Did you think of this username due to Arthur Ashes book or see it on Tyson's tattoo?
For Azhar, yeah.......Secret of their success?
Mohammad Yousuf is obviously inferior to Steve Waugh as a batsman, whereas Dravid probably is at this point in time. I can see Dravid possibly surpassing Waugh in the end though, certainly I think he'll end up with more Test runs.I think Mohammed Yousuf, Dravid etc. are all less than Steve Waugh.