Craig
World Traveller
Zimbabwe weren't really.India, West Indies, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe.
Anyway what is wrong with being an optimist?
Zimbabwe weren't really.India, West Indies, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe.
You don't need to demonstrate expertise to be better than the current West Indies batting lineup against spin though!Why? Do they have a load of batsmen who've demonstrated expertise against wristspin?
I mean, I know they haven't faced Murali for a while and I know Mohammed's not as good as him, but still?
I think they were. They had 6 or 7 fine players, Bangladesh have 3 or 4.Zimbabwe weren't really.
Nothing. What's optimism got to do with this?Anyway what is wrong with being an optimist?
He has the potential, yes, but at this point in time I don't think he is a better spinner than Rafique, Haque Jnr or Razzaq.But Mohammed has the potential, IMO, to be a better spinner than Haque jnr and the like.
Going off what Goughy said that Bangladesh have nothing going for them except well wishers and optimists, which reading it read like was being implyed is a bad thing.I think they were. They had 6 or 7 fine players, Bangladesh have 3 or 4.
Nothing. What's optimism got to do with this?
Firstly, that's debatable, and secondly, I'd back Habibul, Rajin and even Saqibul from the little I've seen on him to be better players of spin than what the West Indies have served up recently. That, again, though, is debatable. However only debatable in the sense that differing opinions will exist on it - as you really can't prove it either way. This one of those topics IMO where one gives an opinion and moves on given the hypothetical and reasonably close nature of it. I don't think it can be truly debated as the fundemental unprovable basic facts are what would be at the core of the debate - and arguing such normally just ends up... well, see any thread that both you and tec have posted in...But Mohammed has the potential, IMO, to be a better spinner than Haque jnr and the like.
Pleased what happened?.As long as we still win tomorrow, I'll be pleased it happened.
Well... it is bad. Bangladesh are bad right now, no two ways about it.Going off what Goughy said that Bangladesh have nothing going for them except well wishers and optimists, which reading it read like was being implyed is a bad thing.
That West Indies didn't fall in a heap like they did at Headingley and end-up losing by 300 runs; instead, putting-up a really impressive fightback.Pleased what happened?.
So they damn well should be...against this standard of bowling. I will be laughing so hard if the Windies manage to pull this of.instead, putting-up a really impressive fightback.
Nah, thats not a bad thing. What I meant was that they have a lot of people that wish them well and like to see them do well and like to put a rosy spin on events but have virtually zero players of any calibre.Going off what Goughy said that Bangladesh have nothing going for them except well wishers and optimists, which reading it read like was being implyed is a bad thing.
Why'll you be laughing? I certainly won't be smiling AT ALL if they manage to chase the total down, but I will if they don't.So they damn well should be...against this standard of bowling. I will be laughing so hard if the Windies manage to pull this of.
Because I ain't an English fan and because of how poor the Windies have been for the majority of this test match. For them to be in with a chance of winning makes me laugh.Why'll you be laughing? I certainly won't be smiling AT ALL if they manage to chase the total down, but I will if they don't.
You talking about the Windies batsmen?.but still... it was an awful show by several who've played here and done much better.
Why you not an English fan?Because I ain't an English fan and because of how poor the Windies have been for the majority of this test match. For them to be in with a chance of winning makes me laugh.