Cricket Betting Site Betway

View Poll Results: When is someone ready for Test match cricket

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • As soon as talent is spotted?

    2 5.88%
  • 10 FC games?

    0 0%
  • 50 FC games?

    4 11.76%
  • 75 FC games?

    0 0%
  • Depends entirely on quality of player?

    27 79.41%
  • Must prove themselves in ODIs?

    1 2.94%
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 119

Thread: When is someone ready...?

  1. #46
    Cricket, Lovely Cricket Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    29,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    I'll say it again - better than someone older? If so, I don't see that there will have been that many cases of it.

    I don't see a heck of a lot of teenagers playing domestic cricket in Australia, either. Nor South Africa for that matter. I'm less sure about New Zealand and West Indies as I don't take much note of domestic cricket in those parts, but the subcontinent is the only place where you see teenagers playing international cricket all that often.

    As I say - if it were a problem, for me, that'd suggest it was a case of selectors being prejudiced against a player purely because of his age. But I don't see that this is the case. Most 19-20-year-olds are simply occupied doing other things (often University) and only become the sort of people who are up to and into playing full-time pro cricket at a slightly later age.

    Nor do I see that it matters if 19-20-21-year-olds aren't playing at the top level. You don't need to - as long as you get there, it's not a problem if you're not there as a teenager.
    The subcontinent is an extreme and at the other end of the problem where a lot more players are given chances. England's traditional aspect in this area cannot be justified by it or various situations in other countries. It is not that difficult to see why it is a problem area. If say a player with the talent of say Akram or Lara exists in England, it would be far better than he made his debut earlier than later. If that cannot happen because of x, y, z reason, obviously it needs to be made sure that it is rectified.

  2. #47
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    What about if he can't make his debut because his parents and himself are more concerned with getting his degree?

    I don't think it matters too much, myself, TBH - if he doesn't make his debut at 19, he'll make it at 23 and still excel.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  3. #48
    Cricket, Lovely Cricket Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    29,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    What about if he can't make his debut because his parents and himself are more concerned with getting his degree?
    Football has younger stars going through. Now you might say football is more general population and cricket is more elitist. What about tennis then? Even tennis has some one like Andy Murray. Whatever. I shouldn't even go into other sports for this because more often than not a person whose goal is to play cricket would select sports opportunities before any thing else.

    I don't think it matters too much, myself, TBH - if he doesn't make his debut at 19, he'll make it at 23 and still excel.
    It does matter! If Cook,x, y , z played international cricket, say 2 years later, obviously England would be devoid of his services for those 2 years.

  4. #49
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Pratyush View Post
    Football has younger stars going through. Now you might say football is more general population and cricket is more elitist. What about tennis then? Even tennis has some one like Andy Murray. Whatever. I shouldn't even go into other sports for this because more often than not a person whose goal is to play cricket would select sports opportunities before any thing else.
    As regards football, there's absolutely no doubt that there are more people destined for the cricket scene who, for instance, take education further. Not remotely elitist to say that, it's just the way things are.

    I'm not terribly familiar with many other sports, TBH, but there's no doubt that a good deal of the best cricketers take education to the early 20s. And there's no combining Uni with international cricket.
    It does matter! If Cook,x, y , z played international cricket, say 2 years later, obviously England would be devoid of his services for those 2 years.
    But the chances are someone else would be playing and doing reasonably.

    If Cook was playing cricket (and not, say, attending Uni) and performing as he has been, he'd automatically be up for selection.

    And if he chose to go to Uni instead of start playing full-time cricket, that'd be his choice - it might even be a good one, who knows. Either way, he'd almost certainly end-up having a good career in the end.


  5. #50
    Cricket, Lovely Cricket Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    29,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    As regards football, there's absolutely no doubt that there are more people destined for the cricket scene who, for instance, take education further. Not remotely elitist to say that, it's just the way things are.
    Which is why I mentioned the same and gave another example.

    I'm not terribly familiar with many other sports, TBH, but there's no doubt that a good deal of the best cricketers take education to the early 20s. And there's no combining Uni with international cricket.
    Nopes. As I said earlier, more often than not a person whose goal is to play cricket would select sports opportunities before any thing else.

    But the chances are someone else would be playing and doing reasonably.
    Some else playing? It is not easy to produce international quality cricketers. The best players being ready and making debut as early as possible is always better as, I repeat, England would be devoid of player x's services for y years if it doesn't happen.
    Last edited by Pratters; 22-05-2007 at 02:07 PM.

  6. #51
    International Captain cover drive man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    Posts
    7,249
    Quote Originally Posted by Pratyush View Post
    Football has younger stars going through.
    Yes I agree in the area I live football is the dominant sport it's the only sport most people are interested in. I can't imagine why.
    Everyone wants to change the world, noone wants to change himself.

    -Tolstoy

  7. #52
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    40,023
    50000

    Well, maybe not. I would say 50 is the starting point. People are right in that there is no hard and fast rule, but you need some way to judge a player. If he's tearing FC apart, let him do it for about 50 games, and prove it's no fluke, and then pick him. Even if a player is clearly head and shoulders above his competition, it does not mean he is wasting his time. Usually, they are young and are learning a lot in terms of how to manage their diet, health, responsibilities, etc that come with playing cricket full time. Their bodies are also becoming used to all the stress that constant cricket gives you, and are learning to emotionally deal with that.

    50 games, minimum.
    Last edited by silentstriker; 22-05-2007 at 02:11 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
    Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
    "The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
    -My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

    How the Universe came from nothing

  8. #53
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Pratyush View Post
    Nopes. As I said earlier, more often than not a person whose goal is to play cricket would select sports opportunities before any thing else.
    In my experience that simply isn't true. So many who are destined for international cricket over here nonetheless spend 3 years (sometimes more) at Uni.
    Some else playing? It is not easy to produce international quality cricketers. The best players being ready and making debut as early as possible is always better as, I repeat, England would be devoid of player x's services for y years if it doesn't happen.
    Let's give a hypothetical example: if Alastair Cook hadn't been playing, Marcus Trescothick was instead. And had Trescothick not had his problems, that's what would likely have happened. And so long as Trescothick was performing, Cook's non-presence wouldn't really have mattered. Had Trescothick stopped performing, Cook could then have been picked.

  9. #54
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by silentstriker View Post
    Usually, they are young and are learning a lot in terms of how to manage their diet, health, responsibilities, etc that come with playing cricket full time.
    But you were young... how would you know...

  10. #55
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post

    Let's give a hypothetical example: if Alastair Cook hadn't been playing, Marcus Trescothick was instead. And had Trescothick not had his problems, that's what would likely have happened. And so long as Trescothick was performing, Cook's non-presence wouldn't really have mattered. Had Trescothick stopped performing, Cook could then have been picked.
    at least you know what hypothetical means
    rave down, hit the ground


    MSN: djjacksono@hotmail.com

  11. #56
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    FFS.
    z

  12. #57
    Cricket, Lovely Cricket Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    29,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    In my experience that simply isn't true. So many who are destined for international cricket over here nonetheless spend 3 years (sometimes more) at Uni.
    Which would mean some thing is wrong some where. A sports person or a person who has sports as a career goal would chose an opportunity to play at the higher/highest level above every thing else more often than not.

    Let's give a hypothetical example: if Alastair Cook hadn't been playing, Marcus Trescothick was instead. And had Trescothick not had his problems, that's what would likely have happened. And so long as Trescothick was performing, Cook's non-presence wouldn't really have mattered. Had Trescothick stopped performing, Cook could then have been picked.
    What about a tour where Trescothic declined to go earlier because of personal reasons? Having more able players at your behest is always an advantage.

  13. #58
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Pratyush View Post
    Which would mean some thing is wrong some where. A sports person or a person who has sports as a career goal would chose an opportunity to play at the highest level above every thing else more often than not.
    Maybe somewhere other than Britain. It's been discussed many times that the British don't put sporting success as high a priority as some other places do. But I don't, myself, believe that is wrong. If someone is more interested in what they're going to do after their cricket career has finished (or what they'll do if they don't make it) than how early they can start that cricket career, I don't believe it's wrong myself - not at all.
    What about a tour where Trescothic declined to go earlier because of personal reasons? Having more able players at your behest is always an advantage.
    That tour was after the initial tour where Cook replaced Trescothick (ie India). If Trescothick had never had any problems, and had played all cricket between the start of 2006 and now, it's perfectly possible that Cook would be yet to make his Test debut.

  14. #59
    Cricket, Lovely Cricket Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    29,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Maybe somewhere other than Britain. It's been discussed many times that the British don't put sporting success as high a priority as some other places do. But I don't, myself, believe that is wrong. If someone is more interested in what they're going to do after their cricket career has finished (or what they'll do if they don't make it) than how early they can start that cricket career, I don't believe it's wrong myself - not at all.
    I beg to differ. Look at football, tennis for one.

    That tour was after the initial tour where Cook replaced Trescothick (ie India).If Trescothick had never had any problems, and had played all cricket between the start of 2006 and now, it's perfectly possible that Cook would be yet to make his Test debut.
    a) Trescothic couldn't go to India. So what if Cook wasn't available?

    b) Is having more able players at your behest not an advantage?
    Last edited by Pratters; 22-05-2007 at 02:32 PM.

  15. #60
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    FFS.
    z
    do you mind not implying swearing and sleeping, there are kids around, again its not very appropriate

    to much effing and jeffing for my liking

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Birrell ready for emotional exit
    By leepayne in forum World Cup 2007
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 17-04-2007, 11:30 AM
  2. Providence Stadium - Still Not Ready
    By Rich2001 in forum World Cup 2007
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 26-03-2007, 07:34 AM
  3. Gul will be ready for World cup
    By rodzilla1010 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23-02-2007, 09:00 AM
  4. Unfilled: Lara's not ready to quit
    By Craig in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24-12-2006, 05:43 AM
  5. Glenn McGrath fit and ready
    By Ford_GTHO351 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-04-2004, 07:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •