Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


View Poll Results: # 5 for the 1877-1940 Test XI
George Headley 22 84.62%
Stan McCabe 1 3.85%
Ranji 0 0%
Stanley Jackson 0 0%
Clem Hill 0 0%
Victor Trumper 3 11.54%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-05-2007, 06:09 AM   #1 (permalink)
International Regular
 
oz_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
# 5 for the 1877-1940 Test XI

This is a poll to decide the number 5 batsman for the 1877-1940 Test XI. I've included Trumper in the poll as well as it was pointed out that he played several innings at the position and people were interested in voting for him. The list of contenders are:

Batsman Mat Inn NO Runs HS1 HS2 HS3 Ave 100 50
George Headley - 19 35 3 2135 270* 223 176 66.71 10 5
Stan McCabe - 39 62 5 2748 232 189* 187* 48.21 6 13
Ranji - 15 26 4 989 175 154* 93* 44.95 2 6
Stanley Jackson - 20 33 4 1415 144* 128 118 48.79 5 6
Clem Hill - 49 89 2 3412 191 188 160 39.21 7 19
Victor Trumper - 48 89 8 3163 214* 185* 166 39.04 8 13
__________________
Member of CW Black
Goalkeeper for the Northside Power
NZI Manager in WCC
oz_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2007, 06:14 AM   #2 (permalink)
International Regular
 
oz_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
My vote goes to Headley he had a phenomenal record in the time period. The runners up will also be in contention for the number 6 spot where they will compete with the allrounders.
oz_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2007, 07:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
International 12th Man
 
Shaggy Alfresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: location, location
Posts: 1,738
Headley.
__________________
CW Colts Member, Cricketweb XI Batsman and TIME Man of the Year 2006

"As you simplify your life, the laws of the universe will be simpler; solitude will not be solitude, poverty will not be poverty, nor weakness weakness. "

4505 Dev League runs @ 57.02
734 Test runs @ 48.93
Shaggy Alfresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2007, 02:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Perm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clutha Valley, New Zealand
Posts: 21,817
Has to be the Black Bradman.
__________________
The Future of International Cricket - Rohit Sharma, Suresh Raina, Ravi Bopara, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Shahriar Nafees, Raqibul Hasan, Salman Butt, JP Duminy
Proud Supporter of the Bangladeshi Tigers
Ryan ten Doeschate - A Legend in the Making
MSN: zacattack90@hotmail.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Romance can be dealt with elsewhere - I just don't enjoy it in cricket.
Perm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2007, 02:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
nightprowler10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Madhouse on Madison
Posts: 13,389
What a no contest. Headley.
__________________
Can't decide on a signature? Why not Zoidberg?

(\/) (;,,;) (\/)

RIP Craigos
nightprowler10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2007, 08:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
International Regular
 
JBH001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,236
Agreed. Another no-contest.

Jeez what a top 5 this line-up will have

1.Hobbs
2.Sutcliffe
3. Bradmam
4. Hammond
5. Headley



JBH001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2007, 10:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
International Coach
 
adharcric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 10,898
Marshall, McGrath, Warne and Murali will dominate each and every one of 'em.
adharcric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 09:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
International Coach
 
PhoenixFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bitch please, I'm from West Yorkshire
Posts: 14,986
McCabe for mine, losing count of the amount of times I've said this, but many, many people say that he was more talented than Bradman, he just didn't have the application or concentration or desire to be great.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top_Cat View Post
1) Had double pneumonia as a kid, as did my twin sis. Doctors told my parents to pray that we lived through the night. Dad said **** off, I'm an atheist, you ****s better save my kids, etc. Then prayed anyway.
PhoenixFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 09:59 AM   #9 (permalink)
International Coach
 
grecian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hanging on !
Posts: 11,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhoenixFire View Post
McCabe for mine, losing count of the amount of times I've said this, but many, many people say that he was more talented than Bradman, he just didn't have the application or concentration or desire to be great.
Yes but application and concentration are major parts of the batsmen's art.
grecian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 10:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
International Coach
 
PhoenixFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bitch please, I'm from West Yorkshire
Posts: 14,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by grecian View Post
Yes but application and concentration are major parts of the batsmen's art.
Indeed, which is why he is not considered a great. But with the batting line-up we have, why not have a flair player who isn't neccaserily consistent, but can bring you amazing performances.
PhoenixFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 10:19 AM   #11 (permalink)
International 12th Man
 
Shaggy Alfresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: location, location
Posts: 1,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by adharcric View Post
Marshall, McGrath, Warne and Murali will dominate each and every one of 'em.
Those bunch of lightweights would be dying of polio the moment they stepped back in time to the 30's.
Shaggy Alfresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 10:23 AM   #12 (permalink)
International Coach
 
PhoenixFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bitch please, I'm from West Yorkshire
Posts: 14,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy Alfresco View Post
Those bunch of lightweights would be dying of polio the moment they stepped back in time to the 30's.


Nah, McGrath, Murali and Marshall would survive in any age, not sure about Warne, I expect he probably would too.
PhoenixFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 10:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
RTDAS
 
pasag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Looking for milksteak
Posts: 31,679
All legends, but Headley it is.
__________________
Rest In Peace Craigos
2003-2012
pasag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 11:24 AM   #14 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
stumpski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Medway valley
Posts: 5,266
He batted at #3 for virtually the whole of his Test career, but if this is the only slot available, he should be the one to take it.
stumpski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2007, 01:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
International 12th Man
 
neville cardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1,672
A sympathy vote for Trumper.
neville cardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brad Hogg as a test match option aussie Cricket Chat 267 03-08-2007 07:31 AM
Which Country Will Be The Next Test Nation? albo97056 Cricket Chat 134 31-07-2007 11:36 PM
Mahmood and Panesar power England to series glory symonds_94 Cricket Chat 1 08-08-2006 10:11 AM
England considering diplomatic snub! Choora Cricket Chat 85 11-12-2005 09:18 PM
Go for 50 Tendulkar Pratters Cricket Chat 72 16-12-2004 09:16 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web