So long as it's only Twenty20 games I'm none too bothered. That's what that game was invented for - to be bastardised and exploited in every way possible.
If it means the improper, worthless one and four day cricket that BCCI is running takes a hit...then yes.
World Series Cricket...
Wrong. Any cricket run by a professional outfit will invariably be better than a worthless cricket league run by corrupt beaurocrats with the primary interest of lining their pockets and not the paying public, let alone the sport itself.
It really is the most remarkable blind prejudice you have on this subject. We've done the debate before, so I will try and spare everyone the full chapter and verse you and I both remember, but I just want you to admit that that is what it is - a prejudice.
No, they do though.So you do think one day cricket is cricket after all.
Playing for Hampshire maybe, clearly Warne only there a gain some extra money at the end of his career. I don't see anything different for him to play in a league like this, if they get some decent money.
Which was not a competition with the game's best interests at heart, it was an attempt by a media moghul to win a battle.
It's not. It's a perception of fact. A TV company cannot run a cricket competition of any note, because the sole concern will be attracting viewers, not the good of the game.
The BCCI is as much a professional outfit as Zee TV. I cannot believe you think Zee have any interest in staging a genuine cricket competition, all they care about is subscribers.
