Vaughans front foot when bowling

prakesh · 21-04-2007, 10:59 AM

There's never anything grounded behind the line at the point of release as he's always on his toes.

Are they all no balls?

Perm · 21-04-2007, 11:03 AM

As long as part of the foot is grounded behind the line when he lands, I think it's alright.

steds · 21-04-2007, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perm

As long as part of the foot is grounded behind the line when he lands, I think it's alright.

But none of the foot is grounded behind the line. I don't think grounding comes into it, but just part of the foot is required behind the line. I've been known to be wrong, though

jammay123 · 21-04-2007, 01:26 PM

i noticed it myself earlier maybe the umpires werent watchin properly

no1_gangsta_786 · 21-04-2007, 01:54 PM

The law for no-balls (IIRC) is that part of the foot has to be behind the line, whether it be grounded or raised.

Perm · 21-04-2007, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jammay123

i noticed it myself earlier maybe the umpires werent watchin properly

Pretty sure they would have been watching more closely than TV spectators.

Perm · 21-04-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no1_gangsta_786

The law for no-balls (IIRC) is that part of the foot has to be behind the line, whether it be grounded or raised.

I see, now that you mention it I have heard umpires say that it doesn't necessarily have to be grounded, the foot that is.

Richard · 22-04-2007, 04:13 AM

About time this latest BLE got banned.

Richard · 22-04-2007, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steds

I've been known to be wrong, though

Not often, though - only 13,000-odd times...

pasag · 22-04-2007, 04:29 AM

Thoughts on Vaughan's bowling? One of the better part-timers going round imho.

Perm · 22-04-2007, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pasag

Thought's on Vaughan's bowling? One of the better part-timers going round imho.

Turned in good performances against both Ireland and Bangladesh I think, they looked pretty cluless trying to play him. The West Indies didn't really want to hit him because all the pace was being taken off the ball, Dalrymple could have had the same effect if he was bowling.

Perm · 22-04-2007, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

About time this latest BLE got banned.

I know he had been flaming, but he was bringing up some decent discussion points this time, even if they were primarily all anti-England.

UncleTheOne · 22-04-2007, 04:52 AM

Should have bowled a lot more during his career, but his knees have probably restricted him from taking the ball more often. never forget the beauty he got sachin with at trent bridge in 2002, murali would have been proud of it.

steds · 22-04-2007, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

Not often, though - only 13,000-odd times...

One day you'll rue that, Dickinson...

Scaly piscine · 22-04-2007, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perm

Turned in good performances against both Ireland and Bangladesh I think, they looked pretty cluless trying to play him. The West Indies didn't really want to hit him because all the pace was being taken off the ball, Dalrymple could have had the same effect if he was bowling.

Didn't look like it - Dalrymple bowled some rubbish and wasn't keeping it tight. Vaughan lobs it up more than practically everyone, his hand grenades are highly useful on a good day on a high scoring wicket.

21-04-2007, 10:59 AM	#1 (permalink)
prakesh Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Dillaip Posts: 78	Vaughans front foot when bowling There's never anything grounded behind the line at the point of release as he's always on his toes. Are they all no balls?

21-04-2007, 01:26 PM	#4 (permalink)
jammay123 State 12th Man Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: london Posts: 730	i noticed it myself earlier maybe the umpires werent watchin properly __________________ ENGLAND CB SERIES CHAMPS FUTURE WORLD CUP CHAMPS(2011) AND IN 2009 THE ASHES HOLDERS the official England 'patriotic cheerleader' Proud supporter of the England national cricket, football and rugby teams and of TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FOOTBALL CLUBS Msn: jammay123@hotmail.co.uk come on CW BLUE

21-04-2007, 01:54 PM	#5 (permalink)
no1_gangsta_786 U19 Cricketer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Souf east london Posts: 485	The law for no-balls (IIRC) is that part of the foot has to be behind the line, whether it be grounded or raised. __________________ RIP BOB WOOLMER

22-04-2007, 04:29 AM	#10 (permalink)
pasag RTDAS Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Looking for milksteak Posts: 31,679	Thoughts on Vaughan's bowling? One of the better part-timers going round imho. __________________ Rest In Peace Craigos 2003-2012 Last edited by pasag; 22-04-2007 at 08:26 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

22-04-2007, 04:52 AM	#13 (permalink)
UncleTheOne U19 Captain Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: England. Posts: 607	Should have bowled a lot more during his career, but his knees have probably restricted him from taking the ball more often. never forget the beauty he got sachin with at trent bridge in 2002, murali would have been proud of it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Where should i improve	ash chaulk	Battrick	408	05-06-2008 05:59 AM
my team	bugssy	Battrick	68	18-04-2007 06:00 AM
Mahmood and Panesar power England to series glory	symonds_94	Cricket Chat	1	08-08-2006 10:11 AM
Club Cricket 9-10 Results	Mr Mxyzptlk	CW Offseason Club Cricket	964	27-04-2006 03:41 PM