Woah, harsh IMO.Goughy does a fine job of actually putting his thoughts across through speaking, as opposed to his posting.
I agree. Manan is doing a fine job as the host but Kev clearly has a vast pool of knowledge and does the best job of conveying it. He would be able to lead the discussion from the front. Meanwhile, Manan would be perfect for the "opinionated madman" role - just reserve him for topics related to test cricket and the Indian pace attack.If I could offer some constructive criticism, Goughy would be better as the host and SS would be better as the opinionated madman giving his opinions. That's what strikes me everytime the new editions come out - that the two roles would be perfect if switched.
Not really. Goughy is a fine poster but can still improve in that regard IMO - on air, he's absolutely peerless from what I've seen.Woah, harsh IMO.
Good point. So far, it all seems a bit too organized and under control. Perhaps it's time for Richard/SS vs anyone or CC vs Kazo?Would love to see a bit more debate and interaction between the panelists in future...
Fiery and Smith would be interesting...Good point. So far, it all seems a bit too organized and under control. Perhaps it's time for Richard/SS vs anyone or CC vs Kazo?
EDIT: Never mind, the latter could get ugly on the radio.
I didn't mean it to be offensive, Goughy is a fine poster but I feel he does a much better job when he is voicing his opinions as opposed to posting them on CW. Fuller is exactly the opposite, but considering it was his first time then I suppose he was a bit nervous, no doubt he'll improve if he does more of them.Woah, harsh IMO.
SS please don't have a topic where he's going to be bashing the minnows or at least have someone like neil to back fire at him. I'm sure richard could talk about other things like england and stuff and he does a good job at that.Speaking of which... when's the next one and when do I get my go?!!!!!!!!!!!