Would they be able to beat Australia consistently? This was the question i intended to ask.No ****.
Consistently? I doubt it. It would be a much better contest though, especially since Pietersen can play McWarne far better than most. I'm assuming this is test cricket, btw.Would they be able to beat Australia consistently? This was the question i intended to ask.
Is Australia able to beat South Africa consistently? No...Would they be able to beat Australia consistently? This was the question i intended to ask.
Well SA have won 1 of the 12 Tests played against Aus this decade. Id say that was pretty consistent.Is Australia able to beat South Africa consistently? No...
Tell me- what colour IS the sky in your world?Is Australia able to beat South Africa consistently? No...
Yeah, because you usually only pick three players in your team. And Boucher and Gibbs are so much better than Pietersen...No.
They have: Gibbs.Kallis and Mark Boucher.They wouldn't need KP.
How old are you again?No.
They have: Gibbs.Kallis and Mark Boucher.They wouldn't need KP.
Haven't there been several batsmen over the years in Australia who've averaged that and never got a look in? Tbf though Australia were so good it could be treated as a special case.Seriously, what sort of a question is this, and what sort of pratt would genuinely believe that a batsman averaging in the mid-50s in First-Class cricket would not be picked for his national side?