thierry henry
International Coach
Horne and Latham earn a mention based on playing plenty of matches and averaging 20 with a crappy strike rate. I think Richardson could have reached the same heights if he'd been given 50 games like Horne.
Admittedly, their averages were not great but strike rates have increased quite dramatically, particularly since Latham's days. I think a lot of good openers around his time would have had <60 strike rates, Geoff Marsh is a good example with a strike rate of 55 who was considered a very good OD player. I can think of plenty of worse players to have worn the Black (or Beige) cap though than Horne and Latham tbh.Horne and Latham earn a mention based on playing plenty of matches and averaging 20 with a crappy strike rate. I think Richardson could have reached the same heights if he'd been given 50 games like Horne.
That's a pretty sh1t team alright VoltmanMy NZ team - as selected from here - is:
David White
Mark Richardson
Mark Douglas
Mark Bailey
Paul McEwan
Peter Webb
Ron Hart
Andrew Penn - gotta be the opening bowler with an average of 201.
Stu Roberts
Warren Wisneski
David O'Sullivan - apparently so slow in the field, the batsmen once ran a five to him (while his team mates were begging for him to knock the ball over the boundary on purpose)
12th man - Roydon Hayes
It seems it pays not to be named "Mark" if you're a cricketer in NZ. Bearing in mind I could have thrown Mark Haslam or Mark Priest in there as the spinner.
VoltyMy NZ team - as selected from here - is:
David White
Mark Richardson
Mark Douglas
Mark Bailey
Paul McEwan
Peter Webb
Ron Hart
Andrew Penn - gotta be the opening bowler with an average of 201.
Stu Roberts
Warren Wisneski
David O'Sullivan - apparently so slow in the field, the batsmen once ran a five to him (while his team mates were begging for him to knock the ball over the boundary on purpose)
12th man - Roydon Hayes
It seems it pays not to be named "Mark" if you're a cricketer in NZ. Bearing in mind I could have thrown Mark Haslam or Mark Priest in there as the spinner.
By matches: 1474 runs @ 32.75 & 56 wickets @ 34.06I think naming someone like White on that list even before he has established himself in international cricket is pretty dumb, if you guys just look at the 1st half of Symonds's career its pretty evident that he had a much worse start to his career than White
Don't avoid the filter please.That's a pretty sh1t team alright Voltman
Sorry JamesDon't avoid the filter please.
Alan Thomson - would've only played in 1 one-dayer in 70/71 but was a hack anywayAnyone got any other suggestions on their worst Aussie 11?
At this rate, by the time he makes 750 runs (and why use that as a target and not, say 250 or 500?), he'll have 24 wickets (!)marc, let White make 750 runs first then we can judge him, his career is far from over and after playing just 16 games if he is being named in the worst Aussie XI then how fair is this.
First three games he played as super-sub, where he bowled a total of 3 overs and was used pretty much as a specialist fieldsman.By matches: 1474 runs @ 32.75 & 56 wickets @ 34.06
By time: 750 runs @ 25.86 & 43 wickets @ 30.97
Fail to see how that is worse than: 157 runs @ 22.42 & 4 wickets @ 50.25?
You were in Australia at the time?IMO the problem with White is that most of the Australians (mainly Victorians) were expecting White to be Warney's replacement.
When I was working out my 11 the hardest thing I found in making my choices was that I had too many players who had played over 10 years ago, and most of you guys would not have seen them or know of their reputations (or lack of reputation).Greame Beard should be in there