Im trying to settle an arguement with a friend(idiot).
Out of these players who would you guys pick as the ones most capable of turning a game on its head.
Pollock/Boucher/Gibbs vs. Oram/Vincent/McCullum
![]()
Im trying to settle an arguement with a friend(idiot).
Out of these players who would you guys pick as the ones most capable of turning a game on its head.
Pollock/Boucher/Gibbs vs. Oram/Vincent/McCullum
![]()
Given that Pollock is by far the best bowler of the 6, I'd choose the South African trio. More room to do so.
Sreesanth said, "Next ball he was beaten and I said, 'is this the King Charles Lara? Who is this impostor, moving around nervously? I should have kept my mouth shut for the next ball - mind you, it was a length ball - Lara just pulled it over the church beyond the boundary! He is a true legend."
The South African guys have done it more often than the kiwi trio so I would say them but both sets of trios are equally dangerous players on their day
Definately the South African trio. Pollock is the only quality bowler of the six and Gibbs and Boucher would also be two of the most destructive batsmen on their day (both have ODI scores of around 150). The NZ trio have shown in recent times what they're capable of but they haven't done it for as long or with the consistency of the South African trio.
Member of CW Black
Goalkeeper for the Northside Power
NZI Manager in WCC
NZ pitches hamper everyones averages here but I think that SA trio are much more consistent although they all have entertainment values.
I would back the South Africans more often, but the Kiwi's are very very dangerous also.
Member of CW Green
Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator
We're talking of an X factor here, so the less fancied the player is, the more dangerous they are. While the South Africans are obviously better on reputation, the Kiwi trio can spring up a major surprise. This comparison isn't equal, unless you take everything into consideration, inclding batting, bowling and fielding of all in question.
"Talent is nothing without opportunity"
"You're not remembered for aiming at the target, but hitting it"
Twenty20 used to be boring.
Sponsored...by...nothing!!!
South Africans by far. Boucher>McCullum, Pollock>>>>Oram, Gibbs>>>>>>>>>>>>Vincent.
I assume you're referring to test cricket?
Because if so, SA by a fair bit. ODIs its a little closer, but still SA.
For some reason I assumed he was referring to ODIs. Cos NZ doesn't play tests....
Haha, I just find it weird that people mainly link the term "turn the match on its head" with ODI cricket. It happens in test cricket too.
Well yeah but ODIs turn on their heads more often than Tests.
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
By a distance
Pollock/Boucher/Gibbs
If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits
West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma
Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)
Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net
Yeah in the Odi games you can turn things now and again, but when you have to do it more consistently then thats where talent and skill matters and thats where the South African trio are way ahead of the Kiwi trio
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)