|23-02-2007, 01:48 AM||#1 (permalink)|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clutha Valley, New Zealand
I have a teacher who plays cricket for the State Otago Sparks, the female Otago cricket team. Now I don't usually follow female cricket but I thought I would have a look and see how she was doing, one thing I noticed was that the only competition they played was a 50 overs competition that did not have List A status which I suppose is understandable. Now one of the girls that plays for the Sparks, Sarah Tsukigawa has also been playing for the New Zealand women so I looked up to see how she was doing and the game they played just recently against the Australian women. It said that this game was classified as an Official Women's ODI which is still perfectly understandable. I looked up to see what her stats were like and she didn't have any List A stats, just ODI.
Now my question is, why aren't the List A and First Class competitions that women play classified as special women's List A or First Class games? If they were classified like that, then cricinfo would be able to do stats for the female cricket players which I feel would be a good thing.
The Future of International Cricket - Rohit Sharma, Suresh Raina, Ravi Bopara, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Shahriar Nafees, Raqibul Hasan, Salman Butt, JP Duminy
Proud Supporter of the Bangladeshi Tigers
Ryan ten Doeschate - A Legend in the Making
|23-02-2007, 04:29 AM||#2 (permalink)|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Well it'd obviously need to be a different set of stats from the men's game because they're two different game-forms but I have to say I don't quite understand why there's no 2nd-tier-down status-set for Women's Cricket.
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourthcricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
|23-02-2007, 05:30 AM||#3 (permalink)|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
I'd imagine the reason would be because women's cricket was organised by itself for so long - the ICC/MCC/TCCB/WIMR didn't want anything to do with it. And the IWCC had enough to do with actually getting women to play cricket, let alone employ statisticians to sort out what counts and what doesn't.
However, the ICC did classify women's cricket last year. It goes as follows: first tier: women's Test, women's ODI, women's T20I. Highest level of domestic cricket: "Competitive Women's Cricket" and encompasses everything from the four-day game to the Twenty20, which is obviously a bit dim.
(Oh, and Sarah Tsukigawa's "List A" stats, if such status were to be given retrospectively to women's OD'ers in New Zealnad, would be 79 games, 987 runs @ 16.45, 53 wickets @ 27.47)
Messi scores on the rebound.
Founder of ESAS - Edgar Schiferli, the best associate bowler
A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett and Benaud
Member of JMAS, DMAS, FRAS and RTDAS
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|*Official* CW XI Media Coverage||Mr Mxyzptlk||CW Cricket Media Coverage||1838||11-03-2010 02:25 AM|
|Next Indian Coach||shoot_me||Cricket Chat||41||23-05-2007 02:37 AM|
|China Embrace Cricket!||Blaze||Cricket Chat||42||18-04-2007 07:46 AM|
|Top cricket things not at a cricket ground||James||Cricket Chat||28||11-10-2006 03:32 AM|
|Interview with a vampire.||brockley||Cricket Chat||6||25-08-2006 12:56 AM|