Cricket Player Manager
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 71

Thread: LG Player Rankings

  1. #1
    School Boy/Girl Captain corza_nz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    117

    LG Player Rankings

    I was wondering does anyone know or know how to get hold of the formula used by the ICC for the player rankings. I think it would be interesting and id love to use it on domestic cricket in New Zealand and other countries to get player rankings for each countries.

  2. #2
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Email David Kendix and ask him.

    Having such a ridiculously complex formula that has been devised by one of The World's top mathematicians is absurd IMO.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  3. #3
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,917
    It's probably a relatively simple formula. Just calculate the strength of each side, the player's form, and then measure a specific player in terms of standard deviations from the mean.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
    Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
    "The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
    -My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

    How the Universe came from nothing

  4. #4
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    If only such a thing were so simple!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    IMO trying to measure the exact performance of individual players is so utterly ridiculous it beggars belief. Especially when you try to put them over as genuine rankings, rather than just a form-guide.


  5. #5
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    If only such a thing were so simple!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    IMO trying to measure the exact performance of individual players is so utterly ridiculous it beggars belief. Especially when you try to put them over as genuine rankings, rather than just a form-guide.
    But it almost always tends to be a very good approximation of how good a player has performed recently. In my experience at least, it seems to work.

  6. #6
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Ha! It's a very good approximation of how good their figures have been. And it still attempts to pass this off as a ranking, not a form-guide, and that enables people to make the ludicrous claim "Harmison was the world's best bowler".

  7. #7
    International Coach pup11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    India
    Posts
    12,146
    If their rankings formula was so simple and reliable. Then how would you explain me that how did MS Dhoni manage to reach no.2 spot in LG odi rankings ahead of Ponting who is at no.3 atm. In last 7 games Dhoni played he probably hasn't any more than 250-300 odd runs(which mind you damn good but not better than ponting's performances).

  8. #8
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,917
    Quote Originally Posted by pup11 View Post
    If their rankings formula was so simple and reliable. Then how would you explain me that how did MS Dhoni manage to reach no.2 spot in LG odi rankings ahead of Ponting who is at no.3 atm. In last 7 games Dhoni played he probably hasn't any more than 250-300 odd runs(which mind you damn good but not better than ponting's performances).
    Because it takes into account more than 7 games, and also takes into account things other than scores. Meaning, scores against South Africa and Sri Lanka are counted higher than scores aganist England.

  9. #9
    International Captain Swervy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    An Aussie with a Lancashire accent living in Keighley,West Yorks
    Posts
    7,360
    the ratings have a place in cricket simply because they encourage discussion. Thats all they are, an interesting talking point.

    No-one gains financial reward for being the number one ranked player so I dont see what the big fuss is.
    rave down, hit the ground


    MSN: djjacksono@hotmail.com

  10. #10
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    If that talking-point is nonsense like "Harmison was the best bowler in The World" we're best off without.

  11. #11
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by silentstriker View Post
    Because it takes into account more than 7 games, and also takes into account things other than scores. Meaning, scores against South Africa and Sri Lanka are counted higher than scores aganist England.
    Even if South Africa happened to be missing Ntini, Nel and Kallis and Sri Lanka happened to be missing Murali and Laaaasith Maaaalinga...

  12. #12
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Even if South Africa happened to be missing Ntini, Nel and Kallis and Sri Lanka happened to be missing Murali and Laaaasith Maaaalinga...
    Yup. So? It all evens out, and its not like anyone is treating them as gospel. It's still a good guide, and the top ten in each category tend to be pretty accurate even if you would rather change the order around.

  13. #13
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    It might even-out, it might not. Simple fact of the matter is, there's no way you can use weighting of point-scoring according to assumed standard of opposition without making plenty of huge mistakes IMO. You're far better not to bother and just to assess for yourself how high the calibre of the runs scored was.

  14. #14
    International Coach adharcric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, California
    Posts
    10,898
    The rankings are reasonable enough.

  15. #15
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    At what?

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Team 1st XI help
    By maxmartin in forum Battrick
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-11-2006, 04:45 PM
  2. Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick
    By DJellett in forum Battrick
    Replies: 10623
    Last Post: 17-10-2006, 01:20 PM
  3. Rate the player relay.
    By Johnners in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 05:51 AM
  4. Survey - Player Abuse
    By Loony BoB in forum CW XI Players Association
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-10-2006, 03:44 AM
  5. Brian Lara 2007 Suggestions
    By Manee in forum General
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 08:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •