Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
In a 3 match series, West Indies would win 2-0 in England and 3-0 at home.
In a 3 match series, West Indies would win 2-0 in England and 3-0 at home.
Take out one of the Tests where it rained for most of 2.5 days with the West Indies in a good position. Then there was this game where the West Indies were chasing 269 to win heading into day three. They couldn't take that game into the 5th day if they tried! It's really only one game in the last 10 Tests where the West Indies failed to compete sufficiently to carry a Test into day 5. I see no reason to believe that they wouldn't carry England to 5 days.3/10 means 30% (less than 5 tests series' at that I would imagine). That is against weaker or as good opposition as England. I wouldn't be so sure of taking all 5 games against one of the stronger teams, England, to all 5 days.
England have been doing the same thing with the 2-tours procedure since 2001. Where applicable, though, we've retained the 5-Tester.The tendency has been to host two teams in the season - one full series and one shorter series. It's also typically been a headlining team for the full series (Australia, England, India, South Africa) and a less supported team for the second series. I don't think the touring teams have a choice in the matter, but I'm certain that the West Indies will, in general, start playing shorter series due to being one of the poorer sides in world cricket. No longer is a 5-Test series with the West Indies an attractive showcase.
It's funny that you'd take him seriously.Since June 2003 WI have won 1 test that hasnt been against the minnows.
Yes 1, yet you think they would walk all over the 2nd best team in the world. Funny
Stop spamming and padding out your already inflated post count, by repeated use of a single smilie.
Archetype, surely?It's funny that you'd take him seriously.
He's the prototype troll.
Upon further reflection I've changed my mind.Since June 2003 WI have won 1 test that hasnt been against the minnows.
Yes 1, yet you think they would walk all over the 2nd best team in the world. Funny
Shows how much attention you've been paying to recent English conditions - and indeed recent English bowlers...Upon further reflection I've changed my mind.
As long as they bowled first on an overcast greentop, England would win a test at home in seamer friendly conditions.
I try to take everyone seriously until they repeatedly show they are just trolling. He may be getting close now though.It's funny that you'd take him seriously.
He's the prototype troll.
"An early, typical example."Archetype, surely?
Surely the prototype turned-up on here sometime in October 2001?
In this case we've seen enough by now to suggest probably not.I try to take everyone seriously until they repeatedly show they are just trolling. He may be getting close now though.
There are a number of young guys that post stuff that may appear to be trolling but is just inexperience and hopefully they can learn, develop and become better and more knowledgable posters.
This may or may not be one of those cases
I base my prediction on particular things:Liam, the two examples you described show that the possibility of games going less than 5 days exist for quite a few reasons. Who knows, it may be a low scoring game like this one or one of the two teams might collapse in one of the innings leading to less than 5 days possible in the series. So I find it unlikely that a 5 test series between the two teams would go to day 5 and wouldn't be as confident about making your initial remark - Every game would go to day 5 though.
Given that CW is now into it's 7th year I'd say he's a touch on the tardy side if he wanted to be a prototype."An early, typical example."
Prototype.
Considering that I'm fairly certain he's a repeat offender, considering various screen names...Given that CW is now into it's 7th year I'd say he's a touch on the tardy side if he wanted to be a prototype.
And he now falls into the mere archetype category.
Considering that I'm fairly certain he's a repeat offender, considering various screen names...
I realise he's a repeat-offender, but I haven't noticed any before the Shane Warne identity, and that was in 2005.