Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 124

Thread: Why is Jacques Kallis so disliked?

  1. #16
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Err, I didn't say you were. Just pointificating.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  2. #17
    International Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield
    Posts
    4,412
    EXD? Who's that, not seen it before. Guess would be Piscine though.

  3. #18
    U19 Cricketer gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    439
    only his team mates can answer this question

    i remember when he ran gibbs out and SA really needed to accelerate,
    Gibbs was shaking his head and you could see that he wanted to knock his block off

    but its a well known fact that kallis isnt liked much in his team

  4. #19
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Locked up inside my opium den, surrounded by some Chinamen
    Posts
    45,214
    My dislike of him as a player is largely an aesthetic judgement, really. His standard mode of play doesn’t quicken the pulse & the way he plays on occasion does leave him open to accusations of selfishness; the obvious example being his gloriously one-eyed performance in the fifth test of our last tour when he actually slowed down when he passed 100. To exaggerate his crime, he’s shown he can dismantle inferior attacks when the mood takes him. He creamed yer Zimbas for the fastest ever 50 in tests. Obviously the standard of opposition plays a part, but he seems utterly unwilling to play in any other mode than defence-first against decent bowling attacks.
    Cricket Web's 2013/14 Premier League Tipping Champion

    - As featured in The Independent.

    "as much a news event as an actual footballer, a worthy stop-start centre forward, but an all-time hyper-galactico when it comes to doing funny things with cars and hats, a player whose signing proves once again that the Premier League is still undoubtedly the best in the world when it comes to doing things with cars and hats."
    - Barney Ronay on Mario Balotelli


  5. #20
    International Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield
    Posts
    4,412
    I don't really like or dislike Kallis. Him not saying a lot in the media might have had something to do with that, he just hasn't really done anything to make me particularly like or dislike him.

  6. #21
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by The Baconator View Post
    EXD? Who's that, not seen it before. Guess would be Piscine though.
    You've never seen me use it before.

    Subject correct, BTW.

  7. #22
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by gunner View Post
    but its a well known fact that kallis isnt liked much in his team
    It is?

  8. #23
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by BoyBrumby View Post
    My dislike of him as a player is largely an aesthetic judgement, really. His standard mode of play doesn’t quicken the pulse & the way he plays on occasion does leave him open to accusations of selfishness; the obvious example being his gloriously one-eyed performance in the fifth test of our last tour when he actually slowed down when he passed 100. To exaggerate his crime, he’s shown he can dismantle inferior attacks when the mood takes him. He creamed yer Zimbas for the fastest ever 50 in tests. Obviously the standard of opposition plays a part, but he seems utterly unwilling to play in any other mode than defence-first against decent bowling attacks.
    So you dislike him because he puts his team before the enjoyment of the narrow-minded-pace-of-scoring-is-all-that-matters spectators? Such spectators who ignore the aesthetic beauty of the well-played stroke?

    What's your opinion of other slow batsmen (not, of course, that there are many at the current time)?

  9. #24
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Locked up inside my opium den, surrounded by some Chinamen
    Posts
    45,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    So you dislike him because he puts his team before the enjoyment of the narrow-minded-pace-of-scoring-is-all-that-matters spectators? Such spectators who ignore the aesthetic beauty of the well-played stroke?

    What's your opinion of other slow batsmen (not, of course, that there are many at the current time)?
    No, I dislike him as a player because he puts his average before the team. In that fifth test all around him players were trying to acclerate (time being of the essence) but he almost palpably had the smell of the red ink in his nostrils. There's no way he was playing for anything other than his average.

  10. #25
    Hall of Fame Member steds's Avatar
    Breakout Champion!
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    ****ing cold and ****ing wet
    Posts
    17,201
    Quote Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
    I rate him very highly as a player.

    The area I dont like him in is purely irrational but never-the-less I cant get out of my head.

    He has that look about him that screams he should be in a uniform with a sjambok beating down on someone. He just looks like a nasty bastard to me.
    The man speaks the truth.

  11. #26
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    still scratching around in the same old hole
    Posts
    15,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    It is?
    Ive not heard it. Ill keep my ear to the ground though.

    Generally he is very respected in SA even if he may not be worshiped. His benefit year here was massive. National media sponsored it as did large corporations. It was all over the place.

    To my knowledge, no other SA cricket has had that type of treatment.

    Maybe his teammates are jealous of his shampoo endorsment deals
    If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits

    West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma

    Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)

    Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net

  12. #27
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by BoyBrumby View Post
    No, I dislike him as a player because he puts his average before the team. In that fifth test all around him players were trying to acclerate (time being of the essence) but he almost palpably had the smell of the red ink in his nostrils. There's no way he was playing for anything other than his average.
    No, you perceive he does. On the basis of one single match - against your own team. Which is ludicrous enough.

    Then it gets even worse when you realise that even that case is belief-defyingly flawed. Going into that last day, South Africa had no realistic chance whatsoever of winning the game. Not a cat-in-hell. Kallis could've scored 190 off the same number of balls he ended-up facing and they'd still have had nowhere near enough time to knock England over.

    That selfishness is nothing more than your own perception - clearly it was not that of his team-mates' in the dressing-room otherwise you can absolutely gurantee that there would've been some fallout. Does Ray Jennings strike you as someone who'd bite his tongue about summat like that? Especially after he was removed from the post?

    Most Englishmen had never had any ammunition to accuse Kallis of being selfish before that innings and they lept on it like Peter Atherton and Steve McManaman on cheap aftershave. Australians did the exact same 12 months later, and the case-against there was fundamentally flawed, too.

  13. #28
    C_C
    C_C is offline
    International Captain C_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    World
    Posts
    6,990
    I think Kallis is a good player but there is a reason why his statistics doesnt get him the same kind of attention Sobers/Imran/Lara/Tendulkar etc. gets.
    The reason is simple : Kallis has mostly bombed against good bowling attacks - far more than Tendulkar/Lara and somewhat more than Ponting/Dravid have. His record is quite patchy against Murali, Pakistan and Australia as a batsman and as a result, he is never really in the mix for being the 'best' batsman of his time.

    Contrast this with Sobers, Tendulkar, Lara, Kapil,Imran,Botham, Hadlee,etc. : The first three were/are the best batsmen of their generation : Sobers indisputably so and the 90-present era is indisputably between either Tendulkar or Lara. Imran and Hadlee were the best bowlers going around for a while (or, along with Marshall, in contention for #1 spot) and Kapil/Botham built their fame around producing consistent allround displays.

    His bowling too is mostly restricted to pace-friendly sufraces and he doesn't bowl much at all in matches were the pitch favours the batsmen. Contrast that with Sobers : he actually bowled less in pace-friendly conditions, despite being a fast medium seamer of considerable potency : he'd open the bowling or come first change, pick up 1-2 wickets, throw open the top order and let Griffiths/Hall/Gibbs etc. take care of the rest. Instead, he bowled a lot more on flat wickets (or the rare wicket that took spin) just to eat up overs and give the frontline bowlers a rest.


    What hurts Kallis's reputation is that unlike the abovementioned names, Kallis somehow falls short of being the 'best' in any category : He isnt in contest for best batsman of his time or best bowler of his time. He isnt/wasnt considered the most consistent allrounder for a long part of his career- Cairns and Flintoff hold that honour.
    Even though he is just as valuable as a Tendulkar or Lara in the team-if not more- the public loves exponents.

  14. #29
    State Vice-Captain jot1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,098
    Quote Originally Posted by gunner View Post
    It's a known fact that kallis isnt liked much in his team
    That's not true. He is well liked and much respected. Where on earth did you get your information to allow you to make a statement like that?

  15. #30
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Locked up inside my opium den, surrounded by some Chinamen
    Posts
    45,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    No, you perceive he does. On the basis of one single match - against your own team. Which is ludicrous enough.

    Then it gets even worse when you realise that even that case is belief-defyingly flawed. Going into that last day, South Africa had no realistic chance whatsoever of winning the game. Not a cat-in-hell. Kallis could've scored 190 off the same number of balls he ended-up facing and they'd still have had nowhere near enough time to knock England over.

    That selfishness is nothing more than your own perception - clearly it was not that of his team-mates' in the dressing-room otherwise you can absolutely gurantee that there would've been some fallout. Does Ray Jennings strike you as someone who'd bite his tongue about summat like that? Especially after he was removed from the post?

    Most Englishmen had never had any ammunition to accuse Kallis of being selfish before that innings and they lept on it like Peter Atherton and Steve McManaman on cheap aftershave. Australians did the exact same 12 months later, and the case-against there was fundamentally flawed, too.
    You're presupposing the correctness of your own argument & using it to support itself. How do you know there wasn't any fall-out? You don't. What was (or was not) said behind closed doors has stayed there so you cannot absolutely guarantee anything. Moreover what sort of sportsman thinks "ah, **** it, we can't win, I'll play for myself."? I'll answer my own question: a selfish one. If there was no chance why did Smith declare? Would not have a few more overs been useful? SA took four wickets in the time they had so could well have caused us some real concern had they had them.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 28-10-2011, 12:59 PM
  2. Ponting, Kallis & Dravid .....The show must go on !!!
    By ManWatKen in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 18-03-2008, 05:52 AM
  3. Jacques Kallis v Rahul Dravid
    By Craig in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 19-12-2006, 08:15 AM
  4. Jacques Kallis - Most Underrated Allrounder
    By Sanz in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 29-09-2006, 06:18 AM
  5. Interesting article about Kallis
    By honestbharani in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 09-01-2006, 05:57 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •