• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Former anti-doping head says bowlers still face ban

mohammad16

U19 Captain
Former anti-doping head says bowlers still face ban

AFP

December 24, 2006



Both are back, but for how long? © AFP

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) may be able to reinforce the ban against doping-tainted Pakistani pacemen Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif, the anti-doping head of the first tribunal said.

"According to the WADA code they can apply for provisional suspension," barrister Shahid Hamid told AFP, quashing suggestions the pair were now in the clear.

Hamid headed the three-member Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) tribunal which last month banned Akhtar for two years and Asif for one year, after the new-ball pair tested positive for the banned steroid nandrolone.

Both bans were overturned by a committee headed by a retired high court judge earlier this month, which ruled the pair had not been fully educated about doping matters. As a result, the PCB insisted the doping case was closed and that any action by WADA or the International Cricket Council (ICC) would not stop the pacemen from playing. Akhtar and Asif were included in their preliminary squad for next month's tour of South Africa.

However, Hamid said Pakistan was obliged to follow WADA rules. "It is a fact that the Pakistan government signed the Copenhagen declaration in 2003, like other 186 governments, including 38 countries in Asia," he said. "The Pakistan government has paid to WADA the annual and subscription fee for the years 2006 and 2007.

"This declaration, through culture and sports ministries, binds us to follow the WADA codes and under clause 13 of their codes, the WADA has the right of appeal against the decision of a national anti-doping commission whether it is done during the competition or out of competition."

WADA last week challenged the lifting of the bans in the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) in Lausanne, Switzerland, saying any overturning was against its code, a stance backed by the ICC. CAS was expected to hear the case in the new year.

Hamid also disagreed that Akhtar's decision not to sign a contract with the PCB could give him any leeway. "Akhtar has not signed the latest contract, but he has signed an identical contract before and that contract in its provision is identical and under clause 3 of the contract he was bound not only by the PCB but by the ICC anti-doping policies as well," he added.

Hamid, however, refused to comment on the decision to exonerate the players. "It is now for the CAS to decide," he said.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
mohammad16 said:
Total farce TBH, absolute rubbish IMO, nothing short of preposterous I would say.
just like the appellate court's decision to overturn the ban, right? two farces cancel each other out, you think?:)
 

no1_gangsta_786

U19 Cricketer
As a Pakistani i was over the moon when the bans were overturned but even if they are re-banned i think it is the right decision. If they did the crime they should do the time.
 

Top