TBH it will be harder for him to take wickets then against NZ, they are better players of spin.Perm said:Meh, another 100 against Bangladesh and he won't be very far away.
I actually agree with this. I mean I dislike the fact that Bangladesh and Zimbabwe are considered Test nations, and getting wickets against them count on stats. But Bangladesh really are better players of spin than the New Zealand team. I thought NZ would lose their last series 2-0 after seeing them play Murali at the Champions Trophy. But yeah, absolutely clueless team at times.TBH it will be harder for him to take wickets then against NZ, they are better players of spin.
Indeed. Being ranked a lowly 3 in the world in ODIs, the signs clearly suggest that we'll be easybeats in the future.Francis said:I sometimes wander if New Zealand will one day end up like Bangladesh or Zimbabwe, since the recent signs aren't too positive. Perhaps New Zealandrs should stick to rugby.
Out of interest who would people say are the best bowlers on that list? For me it is Wasim and Waqar. When Waqar Younis was on song in the prime of his career who was unplayable bar none IMO and his mate wasn't too bad either.Perm said:Wasim Akram has 502
Muttiah Muralitharan has 425
Waqar Younis has 416
Shaun Pollock has 364
Chaminda Vaas has 363
Glenn McGrath has 342
Anil Kumble has 331
Javagal Srinath has 315
Those are the only bowlers to have more than 300 ODI wickets, Glenn McGrath has the best average (22.38) while WaqarYounis has the best strike rate (30.52)
Why?Laurrz said:urgh, plz sum1 stop him ..
I was referring more to test matches, where NZ lack depth and an ability to play five great days of cricket. Don't get me wrong, they're still ahead of Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, but they're an extremely weak test side.Indeed. Being ranked a lowly 3 in the world in ODIs, the signs clearly suggest that we'll be easybeats in the future.