nightprowler10
Global Moderator
I say let the one-sided battles run at least 12 hours. It takes the fun out of battles when they go too fast as some of them did in the battle of the subcontinent.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Battle of the West Indians
- Thread starter PhoenixFire
- Start date
PhoenixFire
International Coach
Yeah, I knew before that battle had started that Croft was going to win, but anyhow. When someone becomes 7-0 up, I will call it quits.
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
At times like this, I usually switched things around a bit in the battle of the Aussies. Pretty sure I had McGrath vs Miller in the first round, I switched things around a bit and ended having that same battle as the grand final. Don't think too many people will complain of that outcome.The Sean said:
Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
I'm voting for Holt because my auntie told me never to trust a man with a beard.
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
I don't agree with that, what if 7 people who like Dave Mohammad vote for him within an hour over Marshall? I think letting it run 12 hours is a better option.PhoenixFire said:
PhoenixFire
International Coach
I do have a type of seeding system, if you look at the main page. Sobers, Marshall, Lara, Holding, Garner etc all seem to b nearer to the top of the list, whilst the lesser players are further down.
PhoenixFire
International Coach
I'll just use common sense on these ones. On ones olike this, it's clear that Croft is going to win it, but I'll let other go on for longer if there seems to be more open about it.nightprowler10 said:
Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
Just do Sobers v everyone because he's going to win anyway.
PhoenixFire
International Coach
Personaly, I'd be tempted to vote Viv Richards over Sobers.
Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
PhoenixFire said:
How about putting Sober's, Viv, Lara and Marshall into the last 4 and have the rest battle it out for the right to meet them?
PhoenixFire
International Coach
That makes sense.
Not
Not
PhoenixFire
International Coach
A close friend once said:
"Crofty would bounce his Grandmother if he thought a wicket was in it"
"Crofty would bounce his Grandmother if he thought a wicket was in it"
Goughy
Hall of Fame Member
Hmm, missed nominating players.
Surprised that Charlie Davis didnt get a mention.
Id also have had Logie in for his decent batting and great fielding
and John Shepherd was a good cricketer, short test career but Wisden Cricketer of the Year 1979.
Oh well, Id have 'em in, especially given the average nature of a few included.
Surprised that Charlie Davis didnt get a mention.
Id also have had Logie in for his decent batting and great fielding
and John Shepherd was a good cricketer, short test career but Wisden Cricketer of the Year 1979.
Oh well, Id have 'em in, especially given the average nature of a few included.