A little off topic, but I used to play with a top quality spinner that was about 10 yrs older than me.Matt79 said:He had a persistent injury to his spinning finger - it split and basically kept on splitting and he was on the verge of considering retirement when he found a home remedy in NZ IIRC.
Because its nasty.Goughy said:It turned out every football season he would cut, slice and abrase (sp?) his spinning finger in order to build up a massive amount of caloused (sp?) scar tissue that would enable him to bowl throughout the cricket season without any pain and splitting.
It obviously worked, and I often wonder why more dont do the same.
The friction from repeatedly ripping the ball out of the hand with one finger taking the majority of the stress causes the skin to actually rip open leaving a nasty bleeding sore...shortpitched713 said:Because its nasty.
Anyway, what exactly is a "split" spinning finger? Being a part-time spinner, I've never yet come across that problem.
benaud peaked much later in 1959 i think. so no wonder he was considered not on par with laker. he never became. but still 248 wickets at 27 is very very good.Goughy said:Its interesting when listening to the commentary of Lakers 19fer how they had a low opinion of Benauds bowling compared to Lock and Laker. I dont think he can be put in the top class spinner category.
I find it difficult to beleive that Benaud could make any alltime (or generational team) unless captaincy carried bonus points.
gupte was a leggie with a better wkt/ per ratio and strike rate than the off spinning gibbs.adharcric said:Laker > Gibbs > Gupte