Zinzan
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bond? Not sure what gives you that impression, nearly everyone rates him as one of the best bowlers of recent times.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Most Underated from 95 - 06?
- Thread starter PhoenixFire
- Start date
sideshowtim
Banned
Drops to 50 when you remove Bangladesh and the Zimmers though.
pasag
RTDAS
I think Bracken and Dravid are rated quite appropriately (on CW at least). I'll never forget that delivery to Gayle in the CT final where Gayle was looking superhuman and in the form of his life and smashing us to all parts. Bracken won it for us right there and then with that beauty.
The Sean
Cricketer Of The Year
Ray Price? Everyone I know thinks he was one of the greatest lock forwards to play the game - how is he under-rated?
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
He didn't, though, that's the thing. ITE his career was a bit of a disappointment (ER up around 4.6-an-over, when as I say I initially genuinely hoped and believed he had it in him to have one below 4-an-over). Not entirely his own fault, of course, as several times he was asked to bowl later on in the innings than he should have been being, but there were several times when he got slogged from-the-word-go too (never more than those 2 horrible games when those woeful sloggers Afridi and Vincent got after him - FFS, I hated those 2 games).
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
'Course I do, Mullally was an absolutely superb ODI bowler.
BhupinderSingh
Banned
Don't u need to be rated first to be overrated/underrated?Salamuddin said:
NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
You're dead to me, Dickinson.
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Everyone is rated though. Even if they are rated as the worst player ever - they are rated.
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Okay - thought we were talking tests.
Good economy rate, I'll grant you. Only played 50 matches though. Bit of a shame if he was that good.
pup11
International Coach
Yeah i agree with you on that mate, Dravid and Bracks are both rated pretty appropriatedly on CW, and Dravid is also rated very highly around in the international circuit they call him "THE WALL" but since he became the captain of India his form has dipped a bit.Bracks thoung isn't rated as highly as he should be in the internatinal circuit.
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Chanderpaul for me, as well.
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Haha, sorry.
Didn't like Vincent hitting him, though, and while he's mostly better than Afridi he sure wasn't that day.
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
50 matches for England, especially then, was a decent enough number, and would probably be more equivalent to about 90 or 100 at the current time (or 200 or so for another team who play more).
For me, Mullally's ODI career was lengthy enough for him to be described as a top-shelf bowler.
