|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 24,240
|
The Great Debate Thread
Ok guys.
It's time to settle some of the burning issues floating around in the cricket world today. There's so much to talk about - Darrell and Inzy, Tendulkar v Lara, Simon Katich and the Ashes, and here we will put the arguments to rest once and for all with formal debating. How it will work Registering Just post your interest in this thread, then wait to be allocated to a team for a debate. Allocation Posters who register interest will be randomly allocated to a team, then the affirmative and negative teams will be selected in the good old traditional way of a coin toss. Debating Teams will decide who will be 1st, 2nd and 3rd speakers. Once teams have allocated their speakers the 1st speaker for the affirmative will begin proceedings, then followed by 1st speaker of the negative and so on. Criteria Each argument must be at least 250 words in length and no more than 500 words. 300-350 words would be omptimum. (The word length will be reviewed after the first debate). Players will be deducted points for not reaching or going over the word limit. Each argument must be relevant to the topic, so no gasbagging - keep it to the point! Points will be deducted for wailing on. Each argument should be well referenced either referring to fellow cricketweb posters, cricket writers or cricket commentators. Each argument should not contain offensive language or insults to other debators. The rebuttal speaker (3rd speaker for each team) will not be allowed to bring in new information for their team, they can only rebut what has already been said by the previous 3 or 4 speakers. Penalties will occur for doing this. Winning a debate Your job is to convince other cricketweb members that your team is absolutely right, so they are the people you need to convince, so their decision will mean the world to you. After the debate is complete a new thread will be started and CW members will be able to vote on who they think will win. I will give a summary of my point of veiw and my thoughts which CW members may or may not choose to use when making their decision. I will only overturn a decision if I feel too much bias or thuggery has come into play. As soon as we have 6 members interested the debating will begin. If this catches on, I'll start one in off topic also debating matters other than cricket.
__________________
Cricketweb Colts Captain Quote:
I'm Green The color of immortality, nature and envy - you are truly a unique person. While clearly the color of nature, you also symbolize rebirth, fertility and hope in the world. On the other side of the spectrum, a natural aptitude to money with green coming to signify money and possibly even *********!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clutha Valley, New Zealand
Posts: 21,817
|
Good thread Mister Wright, I daresay I wouldn't be very good at debating these things but I'll certainly read with alot of interest.
__________________
The Future of International Cricket - Rohit Sharma, Suresh Raina, Ravi Bopara, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Shahriar Nafees, Raqibul Hasan, Salman Butt, JP Duminy Proud Supporter of the Bangladeshi Tigers Ryan ten Doeschate - A Legend in the Making MSN: zacattack90@hotmail.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 24,240
|
I just thought that there is too much squabling going on. Here we can decide once and for all, all the things floating around the forum that need settling.
One thing I forgot to mention: The team that does win will then get a chance to defend their title against a new team. However, a toss will decide who is affirmative and negative. As teams will not always have the same 3 players, I'll keep a tally of who has one the most debates and have a debator of the month award. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||
|
International Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clydeside Cloggie
Posts: 3,189
|
Reporting for duty, sah.
__________________
President of RTDAS - Ryan ten Doeschate - The Freddie Flintoff of Associate Cricket Member of DNAS, ESAS - Dirk Nannes, Edgar Schiferli. Dutchmen can bowl. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
The Wheel is Forever
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 36,550
|
I'm in.
__________________
Quote:
-My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with How the Universe came from nothing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,412
|
1 question, how long does a team get to prepare their argument after a topic has been decided, and then how long of an interval is going to be allowed for a debater to post his part of the teams argument after the previous debater.
Count me in
__________________
Last edited by Johnners; 27-09-2006 at 05:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| West Indies Thread | roseboy64 | World Cup 2007 | 140 | 07-04-2007 06:41 PM |
| CW awards 3rd- 10th of Sept. | archie mac | Cricket Chat | 27 | 13-09-2006 01:56 AM |
| Should Ashes thread be moved to CC ? | JASON | Ashes 2006/07 | 7 | 12-09-2006 03:11 PM |
| Is India Over Rated? | Turbinator | Cricket Chat | 26 | 29-08-2006 03:06 PM |