Printable View
There's some good ones floating around
Allan Donald and Michael Atherton
Jonty Rhodes and his flying run out
Dennis Lillee and his aluminium bat
Fastest bowler competition, 1979
A tribute to Scott Muller, who "had an international cricket career tragically cut short by a lack of cricketing ability." :laugh:
McGrath's spell at Lords
Wow, imagine in McGrath hadn't stepped on that cricket ball
My word. I'd been looking for that video for ages... and to think that Australians without Foxtel couldn't see it because of the bloody Tour de France.Quote:
Originally Posted by thedarkmullet
Bunch of idiots on Foxtel!!Quote:
Originally Posted by andyc
Some awesome bits of fielding.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=eugMgf1P_2c
http://youtube.com/watch?v=aPtC4YnRDh0
:D
Waqar's ODI 7 - 36 against England.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll0WIBM6QaY&NR
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
LOL @ Sanga & Freddy. That's gold!
I have emailed James twice already, he has removed link of other sites where cricket is shown.Yet, youtube is allowed?
If the site is concerned about copyright, why allow youtube? any particular reason for double standards
I love the song choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by andyc
Because users who view YouTube are not liable for any copyright infringement pertaining to the clip. Only the person/s responsible for the upload.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajeev
"In connection with User Submissions, you affirm, represent, and/or warrant that: (i) you own or have the necessary licenses, rights, consents, and permissions to use and authorize YouTube to use all patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights in and to any and all User Submissions to enable inclusion and use of the User Submissions in the manner contemplated by the Website and these Terms of Service"
...further to...
"However, by submitting the User Submissions to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its successor's) business"
That YouTube allows the clips to be shown is exercising the above right, having stated that they are not responsible for any legal hassle pertaining to the supposed owner of the clip (ie person who uploaded it).
EDIT: Worth noting that YouTube also monitors the site for copyright infringement and removes any footage seen to do so when notified. This further lessens the liability of the viewer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
..My Friend, Brilliant Read..Ahem...
I was talking about other sites where video is shown, just like Youtube
BTW, Youtube and any other site doesnt remove the videos unless the provider complaints
Copyright is copyright, however it is interpreted..I am just confused abt cricketweb's policy on this
cricket videos unplugged
How is it different from youtube? video source is from ESPN or SKY or someone else. yet the above blog is *** 'd out? why
I don't know much about it but isn't it legal because you don't gain your own copy of it from YouTube, you can only use the uploaders license to watch it.
Excuse me?
You mean to say, it's fine to record and upload on Youtube.com (without anyone's permission) but it's not fine to record and upload on your blog/site?
..and even if someone takes a link of youtube.com (which I am not refering to ), it still isn't the issue of asking the uploaders permission unless he went to the live match and recorded a clip
Else, its all copyright ( if u see it that way )