SL Without Murali

[_TiGeR-ToWn_]

What, a dirty drug-addicted cheat?

Would thrower be alright?

 

[Laurrz]

The australian bowling attack is pretty ****** without warne and McGrath.

the key word is AND

 

[Laurrz]

Content filter is there for a very good reason. Don't take us for idiots.

anyways.. i am not talking about ODI's at all.. i don't thnk Murlai is all that effectiev in ODI's anymore...

its tests.... seriously Murali has beeeeeen sooooo much for Lanka in tests...hes basically the it factor... like when u say ... how do u beat sri lanka? you automatically think... combat Murali and you've got it!

so this is the past decade.... would SL be **** without Murali ? i would think so just speaking logically... look at his 5 wicket hauls lol

 

[Turbinator]

He had asked people to stop circumventing the content filter with the "s" word, and you carried on doing it.

lol "stop circumcising the content filter"

 

[Smudge]

lol "stop circumcising the content filter"

Yeah, classic...


How old are you? 8?

 

[aussie]

He had asked people to stop circumventing the content filter with the "s" word, and you carried on doing it.

well i didn't hear nor see any warning, he could have simply told me, haha some people on this site are something else..

 

[Dasa]

well i didn't hear nor see any warning, he could have simply told me, haha some people on this site are something else..

The post directly above your first in the thread:

Content filter is there for a very good reason. Don't take us for idiots.

 

[Turbinator]

Yeah, classic...


How old are you? 8?

geez relx i am jk..........i haf been on CW for like 1 week now and i feel its great and all its a great site with great people but i feel we need to lighten up the atmosphere more.......

 

[aussie]

The post directly above your first in the thread:

well i didn't see it, all i did was scroll down say dinu23's post replied & then i was on page 2.

 

[dinu23]

Based on the back-up they have had for McGrath & Warne over the last 11 years, with the likes of Gillespie, Lee, Kasper, Reifell, Fleming, Bichel, Clark, MacGill & Miller that doesn't look like sh.t to me.

Even currently an attack without McGrath/Warne would be possibly Lee/Clark/Gillespie/MacGill, no superb but not sh.t.

Lee/Clark/Gillespie/MacGill, an average attack I would say.

 

[Jono]

Taking one of the greatest bowlers of all time will ALWAYS have a large effect. To say it wouldn't do much to the SL ODI team is a bit silly really. Yeah they beat England, but its England. Murali is one of the best ODI bowlers ever, you can't just replace him.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Murali is Sri Lanka's Maradona !!

Slightly unfortunate comparison on a forum with a fair percentage of English posters. I'd have gone for Pele myself.

 

[marc71178]

The post directly above your first in the thread:

To be fair to Aussie, if he was replying to something he could easily have missed the comment from Neil.

Mind you, the length of time he has been on here, he should know the rules!

 

[nightprowler10]

murali is a liability on the SL team, selectors shud kik him out

The best post on CW in a long time!

 

[Laurrz]

Lee/Clark/Gillespie/MacGill, an average attack I would say.

back in the past..i disagree... Gillespie aws one of the bets fast bowlers back then... how ppl forget... LEe wasn't taht good and noone kenw Clark

i'd say Kaspa and Bichel

 

[AussieDominance]

id have to say that was the hardest thing i have ever read laurence!