Slats4ever
International Vice-Captain
i put my hand up for smith... looks like i'm the only one
Actually I was pretty surprised to see no support for Smith and so much for, say, Sehwag. I suppose its on account of the demographics of the population of CWSlats4ever said:i put my hand up for smith... looks like i'm the only one
How come you didn't vote for Slater Mr. "Slats4ever"Slats4ever said:i put my hand up for smith... looks like i'm the only one
And i am an Indian who voted for Goochaussie tragic said:I just realised that Anwar (13 votes) may have a distinct advantage as he's the only PAK opener, whereas ENG votes may be spread between Vaughan, Trescothick, Strauss and Gooch (total 12 votes), while AUS votes may be split between Langer, Boonie and Slats (total 15 votes)
Of course this is pure speculation with no idea how people are voting (and I'm an aussie that voted for Sehwag)
Indeed.Dasa said:I'd say Vaughan isn't rated highly anymore because he hasn't done too well in a long time. He only ever had 1-2 years at the top, everything outside that has been average, which is unfortunate because he's a treat to watch when in full flow.
Very true. Seem to remember he's got a lot of single-figure scores recently too, which is something you really don't want from your openers.Dasa said:I'd say Vaughan isn't rated highly anymore because he hasn't done too well in a long time. He only ever had 1-2 years at the top, everything outside that has been average, which is unfortunate because he's a treat to watch when in full flow.
When in full form/flight he is easily the best batsman to watch.marc71178 said:Indeed.
Its a shame because he still has the odd day when he has a flash of brilliance and when that happens I'd say he's as good a batsman to watch score a hundred as anyone in the world.
looks like that aussie tragic. i liked anwar a lot. but i cant believe we have selected an opener without a single double century to his credit. his flair probably got him more votes than gooch who i thought was a better opener. but that is just my opinion. most of the members believe in him to handle job.aussie tragic said:hmmm, votes have slowed at 67 votes, which is the same number of voters in the first Poll....does this mean Anwar is the winner???...which I guess means Langer and Sehwag would have to settle for the World 2nd XI.
looks like that aussie tragic. i liked anwar a lot. but i cant believe we have selected an opener without a single double century to his credit. his flair probably got him more votes than gooch who i thought was a better opener. but that is just my opinion. most of the members believe in him to handle job.aussie tragic said:hmmm, votes have slowed at 67 votes, which is the same number of voters in the first Poll....does this mean Anwar is the winner???...which I guess means Langer and Sehwag would have to settle for the World 2nd XI.
Well, with the Poll closing with Anwar and Sehwag equal on 16 votes, I propose one of the following:Fusion said:I think there should be a playoff between the top 3 vote getters.
I suggest option 2, but with only Anwar, Sehwag, and Langer. Top 3 should be enough.aussie tragic said:Well, with the Poll closing with Anwar and Sehwag equal on 16 votes, I propose one of the following:
(1) Have a vote of between Sehwag and Anwar; or
(2) Have a vote off between Sehwag, Anwar, Langer and Gooch.
I think a 3-day Poll should be enough. What do you think?
I agree with above as in hindsight, I don't think it's fair to now give Langer and Gooch another shot.silentstriker said:I say top two. THats enough, they got the most votes. I wouldn't like a second round at all,e xcept they are tied.
So it should be just two.