Cricket & Terrorism

[_TiGeR-ToWn_]

I understand that. My point however, is that, the cricketers aren't at much danger on the cricket field, certainly not from terrorists. Therefore,it would be wrong to cut-off player-fan interaction because of fears about terrorism.

Yes I never said that player/fan interaction should be cut out, i agree that it is very important for the growth of cricket. I more like to see a stamp down on what is brought into the grounds, more in depth searches of the hooligans, eviction of more rowdy people then they do at the moment.

 

[Matteh]

don't out politicize me.. I'll kick your *** when I've done my degree

I learnt it in AS Philosophy & Ethics tbh. Trouble is, there's also a version of Utilitarianism which says things that are inherently better should be saved. So you could argue, sod all the masses to keep cricketers safe.

 

[Langeveldt]

I learnt it in AS Philosophy & Ethics tbh. Trouble is, there's also a version of Utilitarianism which says things that are inherently better should be saved. So you could argue, sod all the masses to keep cricketers safe.

So is AB de Villiers > than say Sean Fuller or Borcich?

 

[Matteh]

Certainly better than Borcich...