Possibly slightly underachieved as a batter at least. Always looked so completely in control when he was in & (obviously) a wonderfully fluent, elegant player too. I don't think his average (respectable as it is) does full justice to his talent.Xuhaib said:Some time back we had a very popular thread going around called Underrated/Overrated.This thread is kind of a branch off of that particular thread.
So lets start with Mark Waugh.
Rightlyachieved, early in the career never looked like a batsman who would score 8000+ runs but ended up as one of those player who became more and more aware of his game as time went on and played some top innings.BoyBrumby said:Possibly slightly underachieved as a batter at least. Always looked so completely in control when he was in & (obviously) a wonderfully fluent, elegant player too. I don't think his average (respectable as it is) does full justice to his talent.
Graham Gooch
EDIT: Bah. Beaten to it.
Underachieved easily.AussieDominance said:underacheiver as a result of his injuries
Damien Martyn
Underachieved in the early part of his career and then slightly overachieved later on.Steulen said:As of now, an overachiever, has played Test and ODI cricket without any indication that he's good enough for either. Of course, if those in the know are right, he's actually underachieving, but meh.
Justin Langer
Underachiever, should have stayed great for longer and his averages don't reflect his greatnessXuhaib said:Underachieved in the early part of his career and then slightly overachieved later on.
Ian Botham.
Overahiever. On talent alone should not have been Englands best batsman of the 90s and early 2000s but he was.GeraintIsMyHero said:Underachiever, should have stayed great for longer and his averages don't reflect his greatness
Graham Thorpe
He was past his prime after just 5 years of greatness. He achieved exactly what he could.GeraintIsMyHero said:Underachiever, should have stayed great for longer and his averages don't reflect his greatness
Overachiever.What i saw of him in the 92 WC he did not look like a very naturally talented batsman but i guess his strong metal approach allowed him to have a successfull career.Goughy said:Overahiever. On talent alone should not have been Englands best batsman of the 90s and early 2000s but he was.
John Wright
Played to his potential.GeraintIsMyHero said:Overachiever - not as talented as batsmen who came before him and had lower averages and such like
Jason Gillespie