Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
This must cast doubts over his fitness for the Ashes Tour, although without surgery he would probably have no chance.
Flintoff out
Flintoff out
I tend to agree. Andrew should be England's Brett Lee, and should be used as a shock-weapon. Anything else puts uneeded pressure on him.grecian said:Yes, it may be impossible to prove that his injury comes from then, but many of us were worried about Freddies ridiculous workload in that first test-match.
He was the captain, but surely Fletcher should of idsads something, Monty was criminally underbowled.
Flintoff should be used as a shock bowler in a five man attack, anything else is putting undue pressure on him.
You'll have to enlighten me as to how rolling ones ankle on a cricket ball in practice is because of 'old age'.....When McGrath got injured in the Ashes, it was because of his old age.
No, never reported injuries. A lot of those bowlers, maybe through machismo as we as many other factors, were crippled later in life bcause of this and had FAR shorter careers at the highest level. Bowlers thse days are far more likely to miss games due to injuries other generations would have played on so this artificially boosts the numbers somewhat. Bowlers also bowl at their peak speed for much longer these days. Add that to the fact that people are seeing, because of the above mentioned injuries, just how stupid those workloads were. We ARE supposd to learn from the past, aren't we?A couple of generations ago fast bowlers regularly bowled 1000 overs a season and hardly ever got injured. These days, international bowlers barely get through 300 overs in all types of cricket over an entire season, and are supposedly far fitter, yet get injured infinitely more often.
Regardless if Flintoff participated in the Champions Trophy, we are not liable to do anything more than get are asses well and truly handed to us.Nnanden said:When McGrath got injured in the Ashes, it was because of his old age. When Flintoff gets injured, it`s workload. I understand Flintoff has had pressure with bowling a lot of overs and captaining, but Pidge often bowls over 10 on the trot.
Where am I going with this? I have no idea. But I don`t know how England will now cope against Pakistan and in the Champions Trophy.
God no, we want him to have ability.chooka_nick said:I tend to agree. Andrew should be England's Brett Lee
When did he last do that then?Nnanden said:I understand Flintoff has had pressure with bowling a lot of overs and captaining, but Pidge often bowls over 10 on the trot.
Who exactly are you talking about? Only English bowlers were faced with such a heavy workload, but the only England fast bowler I can think of who suffered a career threatening injury during this time was Frank Tyson, and he later became a successful coach of Victoria, so could hardly have been crippled (he was not really a regular 1000 overs a season man anyway). Other bowlers like Trueman, Statham, Bedser and so on actually had longer careers than most of the more recent England fast bowlers despite the much larger quantities of overs per season and none of them were crippled later in life.Top_Cat said:No, never reported injuries. A lot of those bowlers, maybe through machismo as we as many other factors, were crippled later in life bcause of this and had FAR shorter careers at the highest level.
How do you know this, please provide some evidence (which given the paucity of speed measuring devices of yesteryear, is virtually impossible). It really looks like you are reverting to sweeping generalisations with no factual basis at all, just to prove me wrong. There may certainly have been some bowlers from past generations who lost their pace early on, but I very much doubt this was any more common than today, where off the top of my head you have Jones, Anderson, Collymore and Gillespie who all lost their peak pace very early in their careers.Top_Cat said:Bowlers also bowl at their peak speed for much longer these days.
I am still waiting for you to mention a single instance of these alleged crippling injuries caused by being overbowled. Non English bowlers do not count as they were not subject to the 1000 over a season workout.Top_Cat said:Add that to the fact that people are seeing, because of the above mentioned injuries, just how stupid those workloads were. We ARE supposd to learn from the past, aren't we?