• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Team of the decade (1950's to now)

Beleg

International Regular
Richardson?

Richie retired in 1996 and Dave Richardson seems excessive when you already have Andy Flower in the team.
 

howardj

International Coach
Beleg said:
Richardson?

Richie retired in 1996 and Dave Richardson seems excessive when you already have Andy Flower in the team.
Richie.

Big hat, big back foot cover drive. :laugh:
 

Matt79

Global Moderator
Beleg said:
Richardson?

Richie retired in 1996 and Dave Richardson seems excessive when you already have Andy Flower in the team.
They were six pretty good years however
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
howardj said:
Since Jan 1 2000, Kallis averages 62 with the bat; and 32 with the ball.
56 & 36 when you remove Zim and Ban...

Still good, but the bowling at that level shouldn't really make a difference, and he's not the only one to average 56...
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
howardj said:
1990's

Anwar
Atherton
Lara
Tendulkar
SWaugh
Richardson
Flower
Akram
Waqar
Warne
Ambrose
hmm i like this team especially the idea of Anwar/Athers opening very nice combination, but i'd still pick Inzamam over Richardson
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
aussie said:
hmm i like this team especially the idea of Anwar/Athers opening very nice combination,
How does Atherton make it into any select XI? I can't beleive it. Did anyone actually watch cricket in the 90's?

I know stats are not everything but he averaged under 40 (38.37) during the 90's.

He also had a terrible technique to the short ball. The 'Atherton has a great technique' belief is based on a myth. A product of lazy journalism and under-analysis.

Cue the "but he had a bad back" statements.
 

howardj

International Coach
marc71178 said:
56 & 36 when you remove Zim and Ban...

Still good, but the bowling at that level shouldn't really make a difference, and he's not the only one to average 56...
An average is an average. He didn't play any more Tests against those teams than Dravid in the same period (another player with a similar over-all average). So it is still, in terms of averages, comparing like with like. Do you also take out Dravid's fantastic series versus Australia, sans Warne and McGrath, in 2003/04 which has inflated an otherwise ordinary record against the World Champs? I just think the idea that someone who averages 62 with the bat; 32 with the ball; and is a good 'slipper'; wouldn't get into a World XI for the decade is an absolute outrage! :laugh:
 

C_C

International Captain
My team of the 60s,70s,80s and 90s:

60s:

Conrad Hunte
Bob Simpson*
Rohan Kanhai
Ken Barrington
Ted Dexter
Gary Sobers
Farook Engineer+
Alan Davidson
Fred Trueman
Wes Hall
Lance Gibbs


70s:

Sunil Gavaskar
Geoff Boycott
Viv Richards
Greg Chappell
Clive Lloyd*
Ian Botham
Alan Knott+
Andy Roberts
Denis Lillee
Bishen Bedi
Bhagwat Chandrasekhar

80s:

Gordon Greenidge
Sunil Gavaskar
Viv Richards
Alan Border
Javed Miandad
Imran Khan*
Jeff Dujon+
Richard Hadlee
Malcolm Marshall
Michael Holding
Joel Garner

90s:

Michael Slater
Saeed Anwar
Brian Lara
Sachin Tendulkar
Inzamam
Steve Waugh
Ian Healy+
Wasim Akram
Shane Warne
Curtley Ambrose
Glenn McGrath

2000s:

<yet to be determined as 2000s isnt over yet>.
 
Last edited:

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ditto; Sheesh, that's a strong combination....... Only minor criticism (for mine); having Hadlee and Immi in the same team. I know Immi batted well towards the end there but I don't think he warrants a top-6 spot for the whole of the 80's. I would bite the bullet and (somehow!) choose between Hadlee and Imran and find another batsman like Ritchie Richardson or David Gower or even Dean Jones. Probably have Javed above AB in the order too.

The 90's team is pretty good too. Bit of a shame there's no room for Waqar. On bowling, it'd be a coin-toss between him and Wasim for me but with Wasim's batting, he'd get the nod. I'd also prefer to see Sachin at 3 as I think he's a more 'solid' choice technically.
 

C_C

International Captain
Top_Cat said:
Ditto; Sheesh, that's a strong combination....... Only minor criticism (for mine); having Hadlee and Immi in the same team. I know Immi batted well towards the end there but I don't think he warrants a top-6 spot for the whole of the 80's. I would bite the bullet and (somehow!) choose between Hadlee and Imran and find another batsman like Ritchie Richardson or David Gower or even Dean Jones. Probably have Javed above AB in the order too.

The 90's team is pretty good too. Bit of a shame there's no room for Waqar. On bowling, it'd be a coin-toss between him and Wasim for me but with Wasim's batting, he'd get the nod. I'd also prefer to see Sachin at 3 as I think he's a more 'solid' choice technically.

I thought the same but then i realised that the 80s team has some decent batting depth.
Imran would be good for a 40-ish average at six i think and Hadlee/Marshall both were in 20+ average group.
So i decieded to include both, make a killer pace attack( i thought about sneaking Iqbal Qasim or Abdul Qadir in there somewhere but i then thought that all the pacers named above offer more than either of those spinners in various bowling conditions),sacrifice specialist middle order bat and make up some of the lost batting by giving it a long tail to #9 with even the #10 good for the occasional 50. But you are right- Javed and Border should interchange positions.
 

archie mac

International Coach
Goughy said:
How does Atherton make it into any select XI? I can't beleive it. Did anyone actually watch cricket in the 90's?

I know stats are not everything but he averaged under 40 (38.37) during the 90's.

He also had a terrible technique to the short ball. The 'Atherton has a great technique' belief is based on a myth. A product of lazy journalism and under-analysis.

Cue the "but he had a bad back" statements.
I always had a soft spot for Atherton, I thought he battled hard against some great attacks.
He also rarely had the opportunity to come to the wicket in a position of strenth.

He seemed to be at his best when his side was 'up against it', and it should be remembered that he had a bad back :p
 

Top