aussie
Hall of Fame Member
This is interesting of late Hayden have accused England of being a one-man team since they seem to be totally dependent on Flintoff and the other day KP accused Australia of being a one-man team totally dependent on Warne, since he said if it weren't for Warne England would have won the ashes 4-1 which is true.
But i think we could look at it seriously, if England do lose Flintoff a HUGE whole is left in the side & the balance in which becomes messed up, since he is England best bowler by a good margin & his batting is very important coming in at 6/7.
Without Warne Australia lose an all-time great bowler, although MacGill another good spinner can come to back him up as he did with mixed results in 2003, Warne was missed & the bowlng does lose its edge for sure, but since the overall strenght of the aussie team is is better than most teams on the international circuit & even though since Ponting has become skipper he tends to overbowl Warne at times making it seem as if Australia are overly dependent on him, i think Australia at present can cope better without Warne than England can without Flintoff.
But i think we could look at it seriously, if England do lose Flintoff a HUGE whole is left in the side & the balance in which becomes messed up, since he is England best bowler by a good margin & his batting is very important coming in at 6/7.
Without Warne Australia lose an all-time great bowler, although MacGill another good spinner can come to back him up as he did with mixed results in 2003, Warne was missed & the bowlng does lose its edge for sure, but since the overall strenght of the aussie team is is better than most teams on the international circuit & even though since Ponting has become skipper he tends to overbowl Warne at times making it seem as if Australia are overly dependent on him, i think Australia at present can cope better without Warne than England can without Flintoff.