Page 165 of 165 FirstFirst ... 65115155163164165
Results 2,461 to 2,463 of 2463

Thread: ***Official*** India in West Indies

  1. #2461
    Hall of Fame Member honestbharani's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Chennai
    Posts
    15,694
    Quote Originally Posted by Dasa
    ^It seems like you make excuses when Lara fails. I respect your views on most things, but it sometimes seems that you can't accept he can make mistakes as well.

    Anyway, I think some people are being a bit negative about this series win. I definitely see many positives coming out of the tour, positives that outweigh the negatives IMO. Considering India has been average in Tests for a while now, this tour has been a definite improvement.

    I'll justify why I chose those names;
    Jaffer
    I don't think he'll be an all-time great or anything, but he has shown he has the temperament for Test cricket. He's performed far better than any other Indian opener of recent times bar Sehwag. Sure, he didn't look too solid on the juicier pitches, but he has the technique to be able to sort those issues out I think.

    Laxman
    He is nowhere near what he used to be, but this tour has shown that he still has the ability to make useful runs, particularly when the team needs him. Even in the 4th Test, Laxman didn't make big scores but stuck around with Dravid in the 1st innings and battled through a very difficult patch. Laxman hasn't been treated too well by the selectors of late either.

    Sreesanth and Munaf
    Both of them showed that they have some ability (which they have shown before). More importantly, in their first tour outside India both showed enough positives to stick with them. Still a long way to go, obviously, but I think for two rookies on some unforgiving pitches it was an excellent performance.
    That's another thing I meant to mention earlier. India may not have beaten the Windies as comprehensively as they perhaps should have, but the Indian team went into the series with a very inexperienced bowling attack. That they performed at the level they did is a huge positive IMO.

    An interesting fact to note about Lara's performance in this series - he hasn't scored this slowly (series SR of 47.95) in a significant length Test series since 2001 against South Africa at home (SR of 43.01). It's also the slowest scoring rate for him in a Test series, barring the previously mentioned example and a one-off Test against Sri Lanka, since his debut series.
    I dunno abt excuses. I called it straight that wat he did reg. that Dhoni dismissal was wrong. And I agree that he has had a below par series with the bat. But I don't think there was any real way u cud call that hundred of his a flat track knock. And abt excuses, it is only because I think a few guys in this thread have been very much read to knock him abt anything and everything. It doesn't mean that I accept everything Lara does as right. I said that I thought he had a reasonably good series as captain, esp. given that he didn't get the kind of sides he wanted, because I thought it had kinda gone unnoticed.


    It is like how it happens in the threads reg. Murali. Everyone knocks him in those threads and then those of us who try to say the real things are called Murali backers.
    We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    In the end, I think it's so utterly, incomprehensibly boring. There is so much context behind each innings of cricket that dissecting statistics into these small samples is just worthless. No-one has ever been faced with the same situation in which they come out to bat as someone else. Ever.
    A cricket supporter forever

    Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.


    Check out this awesome e-fed:

    PWE Efed

  2. #2462
    Hall of Fame Member honestbharani's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Chennai
    Posts
    15,694
    Quote Originally Posted by honestbharani
    I dunno abt excuses. I called it straight that wat he did reg. that Dhoni dismissal was wrong. And I agree that he has had a below par series with the bat. But I don't think there was any real way u cud call that hundred of his a flat track knock. And abt excuses, it is only because I think a few guys in this thread have been very much read to knock him abt anything and everything. It doesn't mean that I accept everything Lara does as right. I said that I thought he had a reasonably good series as captain, esp. given that he didn't get the kind of sides he wanted, because I thought it had kinda gone unnoticed.


    It is like how it happens in the threads reg. Murali. Everyone knocks him in those threads and then those of us who try to say the real things are called Murali backers.
    BTW, I don't think India are as bad as a few fans seem to portray here either. Our batting doesn't look as solid now, definitely but our new ball bowlers seem to be much better prospects than the ones we had earlier. But then again, a lot depends on how these guys progress from these starts.

  3. #2463
    International Vice-Captain Dasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,955
    ^Fair call on both points.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ***Offical*** English Football Season 2004/05
    By Jamee999 in forum General Sports Forum
    Replies: 3216
    Last Post: 16-06-2005, 12:55 PM
  2. **Official** South Africa in India Thread
    By Neil Pickup in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 453
    Last Post: 08-12-2004, 07:26 AM
  3. Latest PWC rankings
    By Craig in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-11-2004, 12:55 PM
  4. The West Indies to Glory (note oxymoron)
    By Samuel_Vimes in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-03-2004, 02:31 PM
  5. *Official* West Indies in Zimbabwe Thread
    By Mr Mxyzptlk in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 554
    Last Post: 01-12-2003, 03:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •