Autobahn
State 12th Man
Because he was actually replying to Goughy.GoT_SpIn said:Why bother replying when he is on your ignore list as you did above?
Because he was actually replying to Goughy.GoT_SpIn said:Why bother replying when he is on your ignore list as you did above?
I was replying to you, and you're not (yet).GoT_SpIn said:Why bother replying when he is on your ignore list as you did above?
If I diidn't, I'd have nothing to say.Autobahn said:Meh, you can still refer to people even if you are ignoring them.
After the Ashes, it was the football season. So, as yet, there's really no concrete answer.GoT_SpIn said:Has the introduction of the 20/20 format changed this perception or encouraged more youngsters? I heard that heaps of kids were starting to take up cricket after the ashes, but meh.
Doesn't stop me making arrangements.Richard said:Make that you're making it.
Given that so far you've made nothing as you've admitted to not starting training yet.
luckyeddie said:I was replying to you, and you're not (yet).
oh ok interesting.Neil Pickup said:After the Ashes, it was the football season. So, as yet, there's really no concrete answer.
We do have new faces appearing at winter/pre-season net sessions - our U11 squad this season is, ridiculously, 19 boys strong. Cue the nightmare of telling kids that they're not playing. However, at the ages of 11 and 12, there's the problem of there being a 2/3 year development gap between a new kid and his prospective teammates, and it's easy for a) clubs to say "sorry, you're not good enough" or b) the new kid to get disheartened. I've made it my personal mission to keep that to an absolute minimum at Exeter this summer.
I did not start playing until 13-14 yrs of age. I worked hard and took my knocks and became a pretty damn good bowler. All the 'special' 11 or 12 yr olds never panned out to be any good and it is their own issue if new kids get fed up. A couple of months of nets and a tiny bit of talent and they can soon progress past the superstars which started at 7yrs oldNeil Pickup said:However, at the ages of 11 and 12, there's the problem of there being a 2/3 year development gap between a new kid and his prospective teammates, and it's easy for a) clubs to say "sorry, you're not good enough" or b) the new kid to get disheartened. I've made it my personal mission to keep that to an absolute minimum at Exeter this summer.
That was my point. However, it's not easy for a new boy to settle in, or get any kind of coaching. Too often, they'll bat 10/11 and not field for three games, and get fed up - and who can blame them?Goughy said:A couple of months of nets and a tiny bit of talent and they can soon progress past the superstars which started at 7yrs old
luckyeddie said:I do - he's been on my <ignore> list a fortnight.
I still get the gist of his side, I think. For instance:
Scenario 1
Marc71178: I've seen a black cat
Richard: This user is on your ignore list
Missing post: Richard: I've seen a blacker one
Scenario 2
Sanz: I recognise Sachin as an all-time great but his powers are on the wane.
SJS: In his prime, he was worth the admission fee alone
Richard: This user is on your ignore list
Missing post: Richard: He's a better fast bowler than Harmison
Bah commitment and effort - over ratedNeil Pickup said:I want kids to fail because they don't want to succeed enough, not for any other reason. I don't believe that anyone can be naturally untalented enough (case in point - self) that they can't make themselves someone who can contribute through enough effort and commitment.
That's down to poor team management, IMO.GoT_SpIn said:But seriously, i have often seen new people join my club team and because they weren't good enough never managed to play a big part. No matter how much they tried at training (which was eventually removed) they were always batting low and bowling one or two overs at maximum. However, the people who had been playing for years were always much better and had a bigger role in the game and therefore more involvmenet.
I meant that often new players no matter how hard they tried were often not good enough.vic_orthdox said:That's down to poor team management, IMO.
luckyeddie said:Yes, but our problem is we've got Richard so that brings the average down a bit.
There's this guy at my school who has been playing since he was 11, taking it dead seriously and turning up to every net session, but he still bowls 50% of his deliveries into the side of the net, gets bowled by more balls than he hits and lets the ball go straight through him time after time in the field. Tell me how he can make make himself useful.I want kids to fail because they don't want to succeed enough, not for any other reason. I don't believe that anyone can be naturally untalented enough (case in point - self) that they can't make themselves someone who can contribute through enough effort and commitment.