• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Australia in Bangladesh

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Great Birtannia said:
The five bowlers (Lee, Bracken, Johnson, Hogg, Cullen) plus Symonds and he must have included Clarke as well.
Symonds and Clarke, capable of bowling 10? This is Bangladesh, but they almost beat Australia in a Test match a few days ago. Let's not go rubbishing them too much.
 
Last edited:

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Symonds and Clarke, capable of bowling 10? This is Bangladesh, but they almost beat Australia in a Test match a few days ago. Let's not go rubbishing them too much.
I think the point was that Symonds and Clarke>> Hussey as bowlers.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Symonds and Clarke capable of bowling 10? This is Bangladesh, but they almost beat Australia in a Test match a few days ago. Let's not go rubbishing them too much.
Symonds averages 6 overs a match. Obviously he bowls 10 quite often.

Clarke is obviously only a part-timer, though.
 

kvemuri

U19 12th Man
Is one of the commentators Akram? I know Manjrekar sucks as commentator, Akram can join him too.

Edit: If Bangladesh can bat intelligently they can score close to 250
 

age_master

Hall of Fame Member
FaaipDeOiad said:
Clarke is obviously only a part-timer, though.
definatley capable of bowling 10 overs though - especially on this sort of pitch.

Oddly my foxtel just switched all by itself to fox sports 1 for 5 seconds then back to fox sports 2...

Lee bowled well early, still needs to get back to bowling more yorkers. working with the new bowling coach between this series and the ashes though should see him improve even more before the ashes.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Johnson's second spell was more impressive than his first. Less wayward stuff early, and he found some significant reverse swing, especially given that the ball was replaced and therefore the new one didn't have as much work on it. The ball he got his wicket with wasn't all that good, just swung in slightly to bowl Mashud behind his legs, but in his next over he bowled a real beauty and should have had an LBW call go his way.

He's still very rough around the edges, but he looks a better bowler than he did in his first couple of ODIs. Wasim Akram seems to absolutely love him. :p
 

oz_fan

International Regular
Symonds out LBW to Razzaq who is bowling well.
Bangladesh have got a couple of quick wickets now.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Razzaq actually has a surprisingly good record in ODIs. Eco of only 4 coming into this game. Not sure what sort of opposition he has played against, but he's done well here again.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
FaaipDeOiad said:
Razzaq actually has a surprisingly good record in ODIs. Eco of only 4 coming into this game. Not sure what sort of opposition he has played against, but he's done well here again.
Well said, he gets Ponting in front.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
If Bashar truely believes Rajin and Tushar are his best attacking options on this pitch after Rafique and Razzak, why pick Mashrafe and Rasel in the first place? I'm seriously starting to believe Bangladesh should pick up to four specialist spinners in home matches. You can't tell me Enamul and Manjural would have done a worse job than Mashrafe and Rasel...
 

Top