well yeah its new, but all you basically did is look at who had the highest averages (except for the blunder of gilchrist over dhoni) ... and you chose bond after he played against the zimbabwe crap and the struggling indian lineup, i just don't think it's as interesting as the other XIs that have been done where more thought needs to be put in, but that's cool ... you're right, we have had too many of thosezinzan12 said:Boring?? Whats wrong with a team of the year....true world XI's have been done to death on this forum. The 2005 side is something new
You should worry about your Own threads dudeadharcric said:well yeah its new, but all you basically did is look at who had the highest averages (except for the blunder of gilchrist over dhoni) ... and you chose bond after he played against the zimbabwe crap and the struggling indian lineup, i just don't think it's as interesting as the other XIs that have been done where more thought needs to be put in, but that's cool ... you're right, we have had too many of those
In what respects doesn't Lee trump this? Also bear in mind that picking two spinners as frontline bowlers is near suicidal under the ridiculous powerplay rules, on anything but the most spin friendly/seam unfriendly tracks.VETTORI- Batting ave 21 Batting SR 98 Bowling ave 27 ER 3.93
If i was going to drop a spinner to include LEE, it would be Murali , as he and Vettori have pretty even stats for bowling in 2005, but vettori is the superior batsmen and fieldergreg said:In what respects doesn't Lee trump this? Also bear in mind that picking two spinners as frontline bowlers is near suicidal under the ridiculous powerplay rules, on anything but the most spin friendly/seam unfriendly tracks.
He sustained his form over more games, didnt he ? Okay, if you're taking consistency into consideration, Bond leaves Lee trailing in his dust, fair enough. But otherwise if there are two guys with the same figures, you would obviously go for the one who sustained it for more games.zinzan12 said:How did Lee do better in 2005 apart from the fact he played more games??
Vettori doesn't need a turning pitch to be effective. And if you have watched him play lately, you would know. He relies on flight and change of pace, two assets would he has excelled at. He would be in any World XIs, fantastic bowler, and one of the best ODI bowlers present if not the best.greg said:In what respects doesn't Lee trump this? Also bear in mind that picking two spinners as frontline bowlers is near suicidal under the ridiculous powerplay rules, on anything but the most spin friendly/seam unfriendly tracks.
Lee averages 39 with the bat and 19 with the ball?zinzan12 said:If i was going to drop a spinner to include LEE, it would be Murali , as he and Vettori have pretty even stats for bowling in 2005, but vettori is the superior batsmen and fielder
Slightly missing the point. How often does he bowl with two fielders outside the ring?Ming said:Vettori doesn't need a turning pitch to be effective. And if you have watched him play lately, you would know. He relies on flight and change of pace, two assets would he has excelled at. .
i could live with lee ahead of murali....especially on a seamers pitch ...not on a dry spinners wicket thoughgreg said:Lee averages 39 with the bat and 19 with the ball?
correct ....said their bowling was close but vettoris batting betterMing said:He compared his batting to Murali I think....
Not many times, no. But the main point you are missing, is that Vettori would be still be effective during the PP overs. In that side Zinzan has named, there would be enough players to occupy the PP overs, while Vettori would operate outside of them. His RPO is outstanding.greg said:Slightly missing the point. How often does he bowl with two fielders outside the ring?
Yes... but he didn't take a significant chunk of his wickets for the year against Bangladesh, did he?zinzan12 said:because I think he's a better ODI bowler than Lee...as well as having better stats for the year...lee played against some crap teams too....bangledesh included
Whether it's Murali or Vettori who misses out doesn't matter. But on the stats Lee has to be above one of them.Ming said:Not many times, no. But the main point you are missing, is that Vettori would be still be effective during the PP overs. In that side Zinzan has named, there would be enough players to occupy the PP overs, while Vettori would operate outside of them. His RPO is outstanding.
4.5 for the year, about the same as Bond's.Ming said:What's Lee's RPO? I don't think it's lower than Dan's.