• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Australian XI: 1995-2005

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Mister Wright said:
How could you have Love in the worst XI - that is a joke. He didn't have a chance to prove himself.
And he performed reasonably well in his matches as well. Very harsh call.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
well for me up until now:

Hayden
Taylor*
Ponting
M Waugh
S Waugh
Hussey
Gilchrist+
Warne
Gillespie
McDermott
McGrath

backup in a probable 16-man sqaud would come from, Martyn, Fleming, Lee, MacGill, Healy.

Best World test XI from 1995-2006 to challenge

G Kirsten
V Sehwag
B Lara
S Tendulkar
R Dravid
J Kallis
A Flower+
Wasim Akram*
C Ambrose
M Muralitharan
A Donald
12th man: A Flintoff
 

mefly

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
1) why does everyone rate Jason Gillespie ever since he got the 200, it is good but he would not make the best XI easilly

2) not katich, bracken, McDermott, love, hodge, you guys on ****in drugs or something? :blink:

TEST
hayden
langer
S.Waugh
ponting
boon
watson
healy
warne
mcgrath
cullen (like him already, would he count?)
lee
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
mefly said:
1) why does everyone rate Jason Gillespie ever since he got the 200, it is good but he would not make the best XI easilly

2) not katich, bracken, McDermott, love, hodge, you guys on ****in drugs or something? :blink:

TEST
hayden
langer
S.Waugh
ponting
boon
watson
healy
warne
mcgrath
cullen (like him already, would he count?)
lee
...
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
mefly said:
1) why does everyone rate Jason Gillespie ever since he got the 200, it is good but he would not make the best XI easilly
So he hasn't taken 250+ Test wickets then?
 

mefly

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
marc71178 said:
So he hasn't taken 250+ Test wickets then?
yeah he has but before he got the 200 he has been over-rated, who cares if he got 200 it doesnt mean he is suddenly the best bowler in the side.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
mefly said:
yeah he has but before he got the 200 he has been over-rated, who cares if he got 200 it doesnt mean he is suddenly the best bowler in the side.
What made Dizzy over-rated before he got his 200th test wicket?:huh:
 

mefly

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
aussie said:
What made Dizzy over-rated before he got his 200th test wicket?:huh:
before the runs he was really crap, if someone had of posted this topic probably 1 person would of picked, a south australian. what made him so good?
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
mefly said:
before the runs he was really crap, if someone had of posted this topic probably 1 person would of picked, a south australian. what made him so good?
really you cant be serious..
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'd have thought Darren Lehmann would have been mentioned at least once by now. Perfectly respectable record, and a batting average superior to Mark Waugh.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
andyc said:
I'd have thought Darren Lehmann would have been mentioned at least once by now. Perfectly respectable record, and a batting average superior to Mark Waugh.
When you don't get selected behind a number of batsmen for the best part of a decade, it's hard to fit him in IMO.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
vic_orthdox said:
When you don't get selected behind a number of batsmen for the best part of a decade, it's hard to fit him in IMO.
When you're as big as he is, it's hard to fit him in as well!
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
No, with Inzy and Warne at the same game, there would've been a World Pie shortage as pie makers hadn't scheduled that extra game into their production schedule.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
marc71178 said:
No, with Inzy and Warne at the same game, there would've been a World Pie shortage as pie makers hadn't scheduled that extra game into their production schedule.
The only reason that Inzy decided to make himself available again was because of the Infamous Pie Treaty of 2005, where it was decided that Warne and Inzy would have a daily "rock-off" to see who would get to eat all the pies, while the loser had to make do with the sausage rolls.

Inzy - can play "Scissors-Paper-Rock"
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Ah yes, and I believe certain sausage rolls are also now immoral, which might have impacted on the original decision - nobody likes immoral food!
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
marc71178 said:
Ah yes, and I believe certain sausage rolls are also now immoral, which might have impacted on the original decision - nobody likes immoral food!
Honestly, you think Warney cared?
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Good point, he probably was paid by some bookmaker for inside information on what he was going to choose in the scissors paper stone match-off...
 

Top