• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is the best Umpire ATM ?

Who is the best Umpire at the moment ?


  • Total voters
    63
  • Poll closed .

open365

International Vice-Captain
Taufel>everyone

hinking about it,Taufel is the only credible umpire i can think of.bowden is crickets equivalent to Tony Spreadbury,Bucknor looks and acts likes he's half asleep,Rudi is just plain awful,Daryl Hair is too pedantic and i don't know enough about Harper.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Slow Love™ said:
I think Rudi is downright awful. I'd only have Bucknor behind him, and I think they're both a class below the rest of the guys on the panel at the moment.

A lot of bad calls are tight calls. Naturally they often get exaggerated to "terrible calls", but Rudi frequently makes some of the worst blunders you could ever see, where they're not anywhere near close. The 50/50's are always tough, and I think that umpires often get unfairly pilloried for getting them wrong, but Koertzen gets too many 95/5 calls plain wrong. And he's been doing it for too long, too.
Agreed, he makes some absolute shockers
 

magsi23

U19 Debutant
ClownSymonds said:
I put in my vote for Steve Bucknor. Surprisingly, it appears that nobody agrees with me.

i wonder why? no doubt he has been great umpire over the years but i think last couple of years his performance has not been that great.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
I voted for Taufel but I am a bit disappointed by what I have seen in the current Indo - Sri Lanka test.

I may be wrong but I suspect he will give you out LBW if you dont offer a stroke and is likely to give not if you pretend to or are clearly hiding the bat behind the pad. Indians benefitted from this on the first day a lot including Sachin and Ganguly suffered on the second.

Similarly he is more likely to raise a finger if you are playing across the line than if you are playing straight. Both Sachin and Jayawardane, I suspect would have survived if they were not sweeping.

BTW, I know the rule regarding offering a stroke (or not) when struck outside the off stump. I am refering to decisions keeping in mind the laws of the game.
 

iamdavid

International Debutant
I've seen Rudi umpire very well at time, he makes some very good calls but he's too inconsistent....day in day out Taufel is the best.
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
And from the ICC this -

'Errors were made' in Australia-West Indies series

ICC admits umpiring standards slipped

Cricinfo staff

December 13, 2005



Brain Lara, who suffered more than anyone in Australia, departs after a poor decision by Rudi Koertzen at Hobart © Getty Images


The ICC has admitted that umpiring standards during the three Tests between Australia and West Indies slipped, but argued that the overall standard remained very high.


Dave Richardson, the ICC's general manager, said he was happy to acknowledge that errors were made. "There's no point shying away from that," he explained, "but having said that, we feel the overall standard of umpiring has improved in recent years, particularly with the advent of the elite panel."


The ICC maintains figures on every match, assessing the percentage of out and not-out decisions against each appeal deemed to be correct. Two seasons ago, when this scheme first started, the percentage was 90.9; last year, that rose to 94.8%. It is, however, unclear whether this includes the significant number of spurious appeals which are a feature of some games, or just the closer ones.

"We expect the percentages [for the West Indies-Australia Tests] to be lower than those averages but for the first time we have the means now of providing the umpires with feedback and addressing that." The West Indies board was so outraged with a series of poor decisions that it lodged a formal protest with the ICC.

"We feel the overall standard of umpiring has improved in recent years," Richardson added, "particularly with the advent of the elite panel."


The elite panel should number eight, but David Shepherd, who umpired his last Test in June, has yet to be replaced, adding to the burden on the others. In the last year, for example, Billy Bowden has stood in 12 Tests and 22 ODIs, a possible total of 82 days, discounting the time spent traveling and preparing. He has officiated in every major country except Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in that time. It is hardly surprising that the seven have begun to look jaded of late.


Malcolm Speed, the ICC chief executive, indicated that the elite panel might well be expanded, but it will not be easy to find more officials to stand up to the intense pressure and time away from home the job involves. Peter Willey, regarded as one of the best umpires, declined a place on the elite panel as it would have meant him spending too long away from his family.



Cricinfo has been monitoring umpires' performances in detail for several months and we will soon be unveiling our own ratings system.

© Cricinfo
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
JASON said:
And from the ICC this -

'Errors were made' in Australia-West Indies series

ICC admits umpiring standards slipped
Well, well, well.

Would we have ever known if ICC hadn't told us ?

Hey Jason thats wbout ICC not you :)

I am really scared of people misunderstanding my sarcasm nowadays :huh:
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
SJS said:
Well, well, well.

Would we have ever known if ICC hadn't told us ?

Hey Jason thats wbout ICC not you :)

I am really scared of people misunderstanding my sarcasm nowadays :huh:
I understood you perfectly the first time,Einstein !! :@ :@ :D :D :D
 

a10khan

School Boy/Girl Captain
The vote is a fair one. Taufel, Dar and Bucknor are my favs. They are totally unbiased and dont bend under pressure.

Koertzen and Hair are the worst possible umpires. I have seen them now for a few years and I can safely say that some of there decisions are pre-meditated! Its sounds ridiculous, but its true. Its as if they have certain teams that they favour, and they target the other team's top batsmen to deny it victory. I used to be naive about this, but the times their decisions go in favour of certain teams, its made me realise that there is some sort of a bias there.

Lastly, I dont think Bowden is as bad as people make him out to be. Alright he is a show-pony, but his decision-making is decent for the most part.
 

Top