Yeah, fair enough for my money. He certainly made poor old MPV look a tad foolish with his dismissal.Jono said:Absolutely nothing wrong with it, other than its ability to destroy the England batting.
The best slower ball i've seen was Mark Ealham playing for Nottinghamshire in the CC at Kent, they showed on the telly how the only difference between them was that he didn't flick his wrist forward a bit during the slower one.45.4 Agarkar to Maharoof, OUT: got'm! fulltoss and that's a slower
delivery, a real slow one, Maharoof swings across and is beaten by
miles, ball hits the stumps on the full - that's Agarkar's third
wicket - Sri Lanka six down
Couldn't imagine Shoaib charging in 30 metres every time just to throw down the funny red thing at 110km/h though!But to reply to the topic, I think there is nothing wrong with it. And I hope he doesn't overuse it. It is always good when the surprise weapons are used as the surprise weapons. There was a time when Saqlain started bowling doosras as his stock delivery.
The thing I've noticed about his slower ball is that it actually decieves the batsman not just with the variation of speed, but also because it seems to dip a bit like a baseball's sinker. At least thats what got Bell, IMO.SJS said:I must say you are probably right about his slower delivery.
I am going more by the difference between his slower and normal delivery while the fact that so many batsmen failed to pick it up would show that inspite of the less than subtle nature (purely from speed differential) it is not easy to pick by a difference in action, if any. In fact it wasnt picked up by many England batsmen. Thats what matters in the end.
I was wrong I suppose.
That spelled his downfall.honestbharani said:There was a time when Saqlain started bowling doosras as his stock delivery.
It looks like that but it may not be. Many dont think so. But what IS different is the trajectory. He DOES 'throw up' the ball. I think it would be difficult to do without a reduced arm speed just before actual delivery. Again I could be wrong.open365 said:SJS,are you saying that Shoaib bowls with a slower arm speed for his slower ball?
.
Yes. Thats right. They did not seem beaten as much by the lower speed as by the fact that having discovered, halfway through whatever they were planning to do, that it was a slower delivery, they did not know what to do with it since it was SO different. It has a similar effect on batsmen as the ball that slips out of the hands of a fast bowler who has been bowling an accurate hostile spell and suddenly there is this ball which from a non regular part time bowler would have been propmptly hit out of the ground. The batsmen are taken aback by everything including the parabola which makes it 'sink' as you say.nightprowler10 said:The thing I've noticed about his slower ball is that it actually decieves the batsman not just with the variation of speed, but also because it seems to dip a bit like a baseball's sinker. At least thats what got Bell, IMO.
Oh yes, it does and beautifully......for now.Jono said:In the end, Shoaib dismissed 3 English batsman with the slower ball in one innings, which greatly aided Pakistan's march towards victory in the 3rd test. It obviously works.
I meant, he (Shoaib) is probably bowling it a bit too much already.Jono said:No doubt, but I'd say thats the same for every 'special' ball in cricket. If Warne bowled his flipper once every over I'm sure it wouldn't have been the weapon it became.
From reports he did seem to bowl a fair few didn't he?SJS said:I meant, he (Shoaib) is probably bowling it a bit too much already.
He bowls a couple every spell. You saw more of it in the last spell probably because he was working on the tail-enders. But I agree, he needs to make sure he doesn't over use it. And you're absolutely right about the control part. I saw atleast two slip out against Hoggard and Plunkett, the latter one actually got him a wicket since it was swinging back in to the leg stump and hit Plunkett right on the pad. Hoggard almost got out as well. He ducked thinking it was gonna go way over his head, but it was a slow one and it dipped at the last second missing the bails by less than an inch.marc71178 said:From reports he did seem to bowl a fair few didn't he?
He also needs to work a bit on the control of the slower ball I believe - didn't a few slip out at waist height?
Lol does anyone remember Hoggard's reaction to the 2nd one that slipped, in which he ducked it and it almost took off the top of the stumps. His laugh was one of the funniest things ever.marc71178 said:From reports he did seem to bowl a fair few didn't he?
He also needs to work a bit on the control of the slower ball I believe - didn't a few slip out at waist height?
lol, but wouldn't it be a funny sight?Top_Cat said:Couldn't imagine Shoaib charging in 30 metres every time just to throw down the funny red thing at 110km/h though!