cricket betting betway blog banner small
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 48

Thread: Why nobody can touch Brian Lara

  1. #1
    School Boy/Girl Cricketer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    79

    Why nobody can touch Brian Lara

    This man is just so unique and stands out against all the posers playing the game today, he doesn't change his game for the sake of the numbers, after all he made it into the big time by backing his own abilities which is what separates him from everyone else. I can't stand it when people criticise Lara for not curbing his attacking instincts and therefore becoming like the other robots who play the game today.

    When i see players like Hayden dominating cricket it nearly makes me sick, crickters like Hayden are leeches. To him cricket is his job, he is paid to churn out the runs no matter which way he gets them, just as long as he gets them, his average being his resume. He will never reach the heights that Lara has in the game, that 277 surpasses all of what Hayden has done in his efficient but boring career.

    Yesterday the Aussies batted again with a mammoth 230 run lead and were 1/ for a thousand but did anyone see Hayden or Ponting cut loose like a Lara would've done if he was in that position. Of course not, instead they were intent on grinding out boring centuries for the sake of their averages.

    I think people can see the human side of Lara whereas we don't see that in others like Hayden, i think best summed up by this "warts and all, with his questionable mental abilities over his own game, with his flat out poor shot selection, with his tantrums and with his inconsistency, Lara, in terms of pure skill and technique, still is just better at batting than anyone else in the game".

    When Lara retires we'd have seen the last of the old guard.

  2. #2
    International Vice-Captain Slats4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Warwickshire HQ
    Posts
    4,294
    whatever!
    WCC - Manager of Warwickshire

  3. #3
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend honestbharani's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Chennai
    Posts
    24,003
    yeah, I don't agree with your post entirely, but yes, I don't think anyone else has blended batsmanship and entertainment as well as Lara has in my lifetime.
    We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    In the end, I think it's so utterly, incomprehensibly boring. There is so much context behind each innings of cricket that dissecting statistics into these small samples is just worthless. No-one has ever been faced with the same situation in which they come out to bat as someone else. Ever.
    A cricket supporter forever

    Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.


    Check out this awesome e-fed:

    PWE Efed

  4. #4
    International Debutant Natman20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    2,710
    haha


  5. #5
    Banned Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    5,124
    Good Post. Lara is the man.

    It does kind of **** me off that Hayden has as good an average as Lara yet we all know who is the better player by a city mile.

  6. #6
    International Debutant Eclipse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Nere a Spoon
    Posts
    2,909
    Bit hard for Ponting to cut lose when they had men all on the boundry on the legside and bowling spin on leg stump...

  7. #7
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Zinzan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    cover point
    Posts
    25,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason_M
    This man is just so unique and stands out against all the posers playing the game today, he doesn't change his game for the sake of the numbers, after all he made it into the big time by backing his own abilities which is what separates him from everyone else. I can't stand it when people criticise Lara for not curbing his attacking instincts and therefore becoming like the other robots who play the game today.

    When i see players like Hayden dominating cricket it nearly makes me sick, crickters like Hayden are leeches. To him cricket is his job, he is paid to churn out the runs no matter which way he gets them, just as long as he gets them, his average being his resume. He will never reach the heights that Lara has in the game, that 277 surpasses all of what Hayden has done in his efficient but boring career.

    Yesterday the Aussies batted again with a mammoth 230 run lead and were 1/ for a thousand but did anyone see Hayden or Ponting cut loose like a Lara would've done if he was in that position. Of course not, instead they were intent on grinding out boring centuries for the sake of their averages.

    I think people can see the human side of Lara whereas we don't see that in others like Hayden, i think best summed up by this "warts and all, with his questionable mental abilities over his own game, with his flat out poor shot selection, with his tantrums and with his inconsistency, Lara, in terms of pure skill and technique, still is just better at batting than anyone else in the game".

    When Lara retires we'd have seen the last of the old guard.
    I agree that Lara is the better player and that Hayden is as hungry for runs as any batsmen I remember, but your post is WAY over the top !!!

    And the" Last of the old guard'??.....possibly in that he has played since 1990, but there are still a lot of entertaining instinctive batsmen around....just look at Sehwag.

    Very spiteful post overall

  8. #8
    School Boy/Girl Cricketer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    79
    In my opinion averages mean nothing in assesing how good a batsmen is nowdays. Ten or fifteen years ago an average of 40 was considered to be very good, mid 40's excellent and 50+ outstanding, look at how many batters average 50+ or there abouts these days, something just isn't right about that.

    "last of the old guard"- Brian Lara is a batsman from a bygone era where each had his own method rather than today, where one just looks like the other. Sehwag isn't too bad though along with Clarke and Gayle that's about it for me.

  9. #9
    Cricket Spectator bradman2005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    At home
    Posts
    46
    Yeap im a huge Fan of Lara,hes the man,the best since Bradman imo

  10. #10
    International Captain thierry henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,231
    Your anti-statistical attitude rather ignores the fact that cricket is about one team trying to score more runs than the other. Average is a calculation of average runs scored. Hence, while your post makes sense in terms of "who I would prefer to watch", it makes no sense whatsoever in terms of who is actually the better batsman.

  11. #11
    U19 12th Man
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Australia.
    Posts
    279
    He is a great player. One of the all time greats. But he is past it now.

  12. #12
    SJS
    SJS is offline
    Hall of Fame Member SJS's Avatar
    Virus 2 Champion!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Thane India
    Posts
    19,346
    To say that Lara is a great player, one of the greatest ever, is to state the obvious AND it does not require running down of other batsmen in the world to prove this which is a widely acknowledged fact.

  13. #13
    School Boy/Girl Cricketer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    79
    "Your anti-statistical attitude rather ignores the fact that cricket is about one team trying to score more runs than the other. Average is a calculation of average runs scored. Hence, while your post makes sense in terms of "who I would prefer to watch", it makes no sense whatsoever in terms of who is actually the better batsman."


    Yes cricket is about the bottom line now, it just turns out that those who are making all the runs with high averages aren't particularly good to watch, that isn't what the fans want to see. There is no incentive in the game to be extravagant and to play with flair, its all about being brutal and clinical and its ugly to watch.

  14. #14
    Cricket, Lovely Cricket Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    29,957

  15. #15
    International Coach archie mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    canberra Australia
    Posts
    10,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason_M
    Yes cricket is about the bottom line now, it just turns out that those who are making all the runs with high averages aren't particularly good to watch, that isn't what the fans want to see. There is no incentive in the game to be extravagant and to play with flair, its all about being brutal and clinical and its ugly to watch.
    It must be me? But I quite enjoyed watching Ponting and Hayden, I thought they batted well, and played many fine shots.
    You know it makes sense.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. good article on lara v. tendulkar
    By Bapu Rao Swami in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 03-12-2012, 09:29 PM
  2. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 09-04-2005, 10:16 PM
  3. Brian Lara International Cricket–Press Release
    By James in forum Cricket Games
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 16-02-2005, 08:27 PM
  4. Brian Lara International Cricket–Press Release
    By James in forum Cricket Web Forum Announcements
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-02-2005, 04:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •