Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-10-2005, 02:34 AM   #16 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Burpey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 7,584
Who would have thought Justin Langer's height would cause such controversy
Burpey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 03:30 AM   #17 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Zinzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cover point
Posts: 9,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Vimes
Nah, he's not. He's 5'11", according to the Beeb, at least
He may well be 5 9 , but I don't believe he's 5-11
Zinzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 05:45 AM   #18 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinzan12
He may well be 5 9 , but I don't believe he's 5-11
I'd say 5' 11" is a fair estimate for Goughie, actually. I think he looks shorter than he is for a couple of reasons: a) his width, he's a stocky old unit; & b) he looks short in comparison to other quicks. Most of our other seaming options of his test era (Caddy, Fraser, Headley, Malcolm) were all around the 6' 3" - 6' 5" range.
__________________
- As featured in The Independent.

"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
BoyBrumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 05:57 AM   #19 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
Scaly piscine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North East England
Posts: 18,557
How tall was Alec Stewart? He can't be far off 6' 2"
__________________
National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th in 2009 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion
24 Hour Scrabble World Record Attempt for Charity, in aid of Daisy Chain and End Polio Now
Countdown Series 57 Champion
King of the Arcade
Reply from mods to my prank bans in public:
Reply from mods to my prank bans in private:


MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk
Scaly piscine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 06:00 AM   #20 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
age_master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 15,777
Ponting isn't tall either

though i would say Gilly would be about 6 foot 2, not sure exactly how tall he is but hes definatley not short.
__________________
Member of CW Green
Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator
age_master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 06:10 AM   #21 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
age_master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 15,777
Gilly is apparently 1.85m tall
age_master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 06:28 AM   #22 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Barney Rubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: All over the shop
Posts: 10,191
Ponting is 5ft 7in, for what it's worth.
Barney Rubble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 06:45 AM   #23 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Rubble
Ponting is 5ft 7in, for what it's worth.
Really? Even shorter than I thought. How tall is Dravid?

Of the top drawer batters today I'd guess only Hayden, Fat Gray & Inzi are comfortably over 6'. Kallis must be about six foot-ish too tho.
BoyBrumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 07:11 AM   #24 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Adamc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the wind, so to speak
Posts: 9,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoyBrumby
Really? Even shorter than I thought. How tall is Dravid?

Of the top drawer batters today I'd guess only Hayden, Fat Gray & Inzi are comfortably over 6'. Kallis must be about six foot-ish too tho.
I was going to suggest Smith, but I guess that's who you mean by 'Fat Gray'?
Adamc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 07:12 AM   #25 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Adamc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the wind, so to speak
Posts: 9,129
Oh, and Chris Gayle strikes me as being pretty tall.
Adamc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 07:31 AM   #26 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamc
I was going to suggest Smith, but I guess that's who you mean by 'Fat Gray'?
Yep. My little pet name for him!
BoyBrumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 08:11 AM   #27 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
honestbharani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 15,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinzan12
Nice idea....but to make it more interesting how about..........

Short Team = 5 foot 8 inches (172 cm) and below

Vs

Tall Team = 6 foot 2 inches (187 cm) and above


With those of more average height - (between 5 foot 9 and 6 foot 1) not being considered for either side.....That would be a REAL Tall Vs Short match up

Its too tough unless you have wisden to find out all the old players heights so I'll just do a Post 80s best Tall Vs Short XI...................


Post 80s Short XI Test side

Gavaskar
Sehwag/ Slater
Tendulkar
Lara
De Silva
Border (c)
Ian Smith (wk)
C Vaas
Murali
D Morrison
D Gough

Note... I'm not entirely convinced that Sehwag, Smith, Morrison and Gough aren't 5 foot 9, but can't think of many fast bowling options....maybe Agarkar ...I definately know that although Marshall was short...he was at least 5 foot 9.....

Pretty useful batting lineup...I'd have Border ahead of De Silva at 6 if he is 5 8 or below

Post 80s Tall XI test side....

Hayden
Gooch/Broad
Lloyd(c)
Inzamam
G Pollock (still playing in the 80s)
Flintoff
C Browne (only WK I can think that may be 6 2 or above)
Vettori (unless Kumble's 6 2 or above)
Akram
Ambrose
Mcgrath

Little doubt the short team has the better batting lineup and the Tall the better bowlers..

Who would win??

Who have I missed ??
Kumble is pretty tall, I would guess he is taller than Vettori.
__________________
We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
In the end, I think it's so utterly, incomprehensibly boring. There is so much context behind each innings of cricket that dissecting statistics into these small samples is just worthless. No-one has ever been faced with the same situation in which they come out to bat as someone else. Ever.
A cricket supporter forever

Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.


Check out this awesome e-fed:

PWE Efed
honestbharani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 08:34 AM   #28 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Adamc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the wind, so to speak
Posts: 9,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by honestbharani
Kumble is pretty tall, I would guess he is taller than Vettori.
I'm sure Kumble is taller than Vettori. I didn't even realise that Vettori is particularly tall - is he?
Adamc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 10:56 AM   #29 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Buddhmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Same place as the Ashes
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamc
I'm sure Kumble is taller than Vettori. I didn't even realise that Vettori is particularly tall - is he?
hes 6'4 i think mate
Buddhmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2005, 11:20 AM   #30 (permalink)
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
 
SJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mumbai India
Posts: 19,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlo33692
After listening to a debate on the radio last night,i was struck by the fact that the commentators claimed that nearly if not all great players (excluding fast bowlers) are of the small nature,now as in small they set a limit of 6 foot,im not sure what that is in cm around 190 i guess. What i was hoping to do was pick out two teams of the best players (records wise) to play the game. I can start a few for the small team that they had named

Gavaskar
Bradman
Tendulkar
Lara
Border
Marsh
Sobers
G Pollock
v richards
Warne
Murrille
marshall
there were others but at this stage i have forgotten who they named.
Now this is where they really struggled,remembering the talls were to compete against the smalls in the record books as of course there is no way to find the winner as they cant play.
They said that the only ones they had found as a gre in talls were Clive Lloyd,a string of west indian bowlers but this is where they struggled foir tall batsmen.
Can someone help to build a tall side ,must be over 6 foot and be able to keep bat or bowl as it has to take on the smalls. I didnt get to the end of the show as i fell asleep so am now confused as to if they managed to get a tall team?
Anyone?

Talls
C Lloyd
?

:
Graeme Pollock and Sobers were not small in my dictionary.
SJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why no Great Britain cricket team ? Salamuddin Cricket Chat 49 18-11-2003 10:02 AM
**Official WCC Season 3 Awards** Blewy World Club Cricket 30 17-10-2003 08:50 PM
Waitting List (MUST READ GB) Rich2001 World Club Cricket 8 16-07-2002 08:51 PM
The Great Indian Team Lach General 2 12-02-2002 10:34 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web