• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

"You can quote me on this........"

pskov

International 12th Man
age_master said:
other way round for me too
It's amazing how in the last year Flintoff has turned himself from a batting all rounder into a bowling all rounder.
 

greg

International Debutant
pskov said:
It's amazing how in the last year Flintoff has turned himself from a batting all rounder into a bowling all rounder.
I'm not sure he was ever a batting allrounder (except arguably at the very start of his career, although he didn't get any runs). For most of his earlier career (before he really began to excel) it was his bowling that sustained him in the team. It is true that he first made any sort of "breakthrough" with his batting with his century in NZ and then the home series vs South Africa in 2003. His breakthrough as a wicket taking bowler didn't come until the Windies tour the next winter. However he was very important to England as a bowler long before that (obviously this did partly reflect the paucity of resources), the most obvious evidence being the extent that Hussain bowled him into the ground in the Indian series of 2002.

In the one-day game, where 'wicket-taking' is arguably no more important that being economical it was clear that he was worth his place as a bowler long before he started to contribute as a batsman (where after encouraging signs in the World Cup he didn't really make a breakthrough until playing as a specialist batsman in the Natwest series of 2004)
 

tooextracool

International Coach
greg said:
I'm not sure he was ever a batting allrounder (except arguably at the very start of his career, although he didn't get any runs). For most of his earlier career (before he really began to excel) it was his bowling that sustained him in the team. It is true that he first made any sort of "breakthrough" with his batting with his century in NZ and then the home series vs South Africa in 2003. His breakthrough as a wicket taking bowler didn't come until the Windies tour the next winter. However he was very important to England as a bowler long before that (obviously this did partly reflect the paucity of resources), the most obvious evidence being the extent that Hussain bowled him into the ground in the Indian series of 2002.
series averages of 52,71 and 59 thereafter are not exactly representative of someone who made it into the side as a bowling allrounder. flintoff always made the side for his explosive batting time after time. his bowling had 2 major breakthroughs, the first one was just after his hernia operation when he came from nowhere in the world cup and produced the most accurate we'd seen from him at the time. after that series he was at least known to be accurate without having any real tools with the ball to get wickets in test match cricket. his 2nd breakthrough as a bowler which really made him a better bowler than batsman was in the summer of 2004 when he improved on his seam and wrist position and looked like a far better bowler and started to take wickets consistently.
 

sqwerty

U19 Cricketer
simmy said:
1. England will be the best side in the World in Tests
2. India best ODI side within next 3 years
3. Simon Jones to have a bowling average of less than 24 by end of his career.
It's going to be a while until we can sign off on that third one !
 

Pedro Delgado

International Debutant
I still hold Fred as an accurate seamer, who keeps an end tidy and takes the odd wicket. It's only last series where he developed reverse swing that he's looked more dangerous and is being held up as a striker; if the ball doesn't swing/reverse he'll be an accurate seamer again. Which is all good I'm not chewing. His patience with the bat has impressed me too, he's not just a blazer anymore.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
tooextracool said:
Simon Jones will be the best pace bowler in the world in less than 2 years......only injury can stop him.
Or he might bowl less well than he bowled in The Ashes.
Flintoff will fail with the bat in India.
And quite conceivably in Pakistan if Kaneria, Saqlain and Mushtaq play and bowl to something close to their normal standard and the pitches suit spin.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Pedro Delgado said:
His patience with the bat has impressed me too, he's not just a blazer anymore.
How will we know that until he faces an attack containing more than 2 particularly accurate bowlers?
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Pedro Delgado said:
No pressure on Jonah then.
If he bowls as he did in The Ashes (or maybe even better) it's almost a certainty.
What, of course, isn't a certainty is that he'll bowl as said.
Remember how everyone was raving about Harmison in July 2004...? Now it's perfectly conceivable that he'll be out of the side (in Tests at least) by next summer.
Of course, everyone was raving about Harmison after 7 Tests where he didn't bowl particularly well... Jones at least bowled by-and-large superbly in The Ashes.
 
Last edited:

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Richard said:
How will we know that until he faces an attack containing more than 2 particularly accurate bowlers?
Not many attacks over the years have had more than 2 accurate bowlers.
 

krishneelz

U19 Debutant
1. ganguly dropped in the next 3 months
2. warne retires in the next 3 months
3. akthar gets injured in the next 3 months
4. lara gets a golden duck in the next 3 months
5. the super series is no super series without tendulkar and marto and this will be realised during the next 3 months
 

howardj

International Coach
My not so big prediction is that if Hayden fails in the SuperTest, he will never play Test cricket again.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
1. Bond will take 15 wickets in the ODI series v South Africa.
2. Hamish Marshall will hit a century v South Africa in the tests in April of 2006.
3. Fleming will get at least 2 50's but no 100's.
4. Brett lee will take exactly 4 wickets over the two innings of the Super Test (providing he does play).

Please think up some humiliating forum punishment for this if I'm wrong. Avatar or signature related, obviousley :)
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
honestbharani said:
Not many attacks over the years have had more than 2 accurate bowlers.
Well most teams throughout the course of the 1990s did and so did several teams in the 1980s and 1970s.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Richard said:
Or he might bowl less well than he bowled in The Ashes.
i cant see him do that to be honest, unless he isnt fully fit. bowlers dont get worse over time unless they get injured or get old, neither of which is going to happen. simon jones has far more potential than any other up and coming fast bowler i've seen in a very long time, and theres no reason why he shouldnt succeed.

Richard said:
And quite conceivably in Pakistan if Kaneria, Saqlain and Mushtaq play and bowl to something close to their normal standard and the pitches suit spin.
and the odds of 2 out of 3 of those players playing in a test match is in itself very very slim let alone everything else happening.
the odds however of harbhajan and kumble bowling well in tandem on turners is not only more daunting but also more likely.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Richard said:
Remember how everyone was raving about Harmison in July 2004...? Now it's perfectly conceivable that he'll be out of the side (in Tests at least) by next summer.
Of course, everyone was raving about Harmison after 7 Tests where he didn't bowl particularly well... Jones at least bowled by-and-large superbly in The Ashes.
harmisons talent doesnt come even come into the same picture when you compare him to jones. Jones by and large was unplayable in the series, harmison rarely has ever had such a series. the ability to reverse and conventionally swing a ball both ways at nearly 90 mph is something that we havent seen since waqar younis and wasim akram in their very prime, the only thing im worried about is that he'll end up being the next dion nash.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
tooextracool said:
harmisons talent doesnt come even come into the same picture when you compare him to jones. Jones by and large was unplayable in the series, harmison rarely has ever had such a series. the ability to reverse and conventionally swing a ball both ways at nearly 90 mph is something that we havent seen since waqar younis and wasim akram in their very prime, the only thing im worried about is that he'll end up being the next dion nash.
That should bode well for the batting community. :D
 

Top