• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Golden Oldies vs Gilded Youth

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Sangakkara, not worthy of a place then Brumbers.

I know he doesn't keep much now, but I'd put him in for Haddin. I'd have him ahead of Tendulkar too.

I actually think the younger side might have the edge, this time around.

Edit: susudear beat me to it.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Had totally forgotten Sanga. :ph34r: Would make it as specialist bat, probly, but leaving out Haddin does give the 30+ team an ominous depth.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
If you were gonna play him as a specialist, who would you drop, Tendulkar? it's a tough call - in many ways dropping him for Haddin would make the most sense, but he obviously does a lot better when without gloves.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
With Sangakkara coming into the side the over 30's have comfortably the better batting lineup but the under 30's edge it with the bowling especially if Mendis is as good as he seems.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
If you were gonna play him as a specialist, who would you drop, Tendulkar? it's a tough call - in many ways dropping him for Haddin would make the most sense, but he obviously does a lot better when without gloves.
Yeesh. Yeah, it'd be between Sachin and Kallis and the latter's rejuvenated bowling would put him ahead for me.
 

susudear

Banned
If you were gonna play him as a specialist, who would you drop, Tendulkar? it's a tough call - in many ways dropping him for Haddin would make the most sense, but he obviously does a lot better when without gloves.
Kallis I guess. Tendulkar's continuing solidly.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
If you were gonna play him as a specialist, who would you drop, Tendulkar? it's a tough call - in many ways dropping him for Haddin would make the most sense, but he obviously does a lot better when without gloves.
Sangakkara's clearly better than all of Ponting, Kallis and Tendulkar right now. He should be the first name on the 'sheet. Those three can then battle for the other two batting slots, with Kallis' bowling obviously giving him an extra dimension.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Sangakkara then Chanders, for mine.
Yeah, I'd have Sangakkara, Chanderpaul, Kallis, then one of Ponting\Tendulkar, for the middle-order.

Openers obviously Sehwag would be one, then Strauss easily the other for mine.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Sangakkara's clearly better than all of Ponting, Kallis and Tendulkar right now. He should be the first name on the 'sheet. Those three can then battle for the other two batting slots, with Kallis' bowling obviously giving him an extra dimension.
Yeah, my point wasn't to question Sanga's worthiness but rather to ask whose place he would take
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Another dig for this to see if youth or experience would hold sway.

Think currently I'd be looking at something like this:

Under 30 XI

1) AN Cook (26)
2) G Gambhir (29)
3) HM Amla (28)
4) LRPL Taylor* (27)
5) IR Bell (29)
6) AB de Villiers (27)
7) MJ Prior+ (29)
8) SCJ Broad (25)
9) Shakib Al Hasan (24)
10) DW Steyn (28)
11) JM Anderson (29)

30 & Over XI

1) GC Smith* (30)
2) SR Watson (30)
3) R Dravid (38)
4) JH Kallis (35)
5) KC Sangakkara (33)
6) KP Pietersen (31)
7) BJ Haddin+ (33)
8) DL Vettori (32)
9) GP Swann (32)
10) DE Bollinger (30)
11) CS Martin (36)


Haven't considered injured players or else Zak and Sehwag would be mortals for the over 30s.

Genuinely struggling for seamers for the old men, but Watson and Kallis can send down a few. Few months & Tremmers and Mitch will be eligible tho.

I'd take the under 30s, myself.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I'd rejig the 30s top 3 by shunting one of the openers out for Trott. Him or Dravid can open.

Under 30s would win, better attack and opening pair. Over 30s have the better middle order (which should be the case most of the time really) but I think the young uns have the edge.
 

Top