Why isnt he picked,
Why isnt he picked,
Bob is very insane stay away from him
FAVOURITE UNDER 19 CRICKETER JP McNamara AKA ORTHODOX
Its not just inzi the whole selection is wrong i beleive, Pollock and Smith captains? yeh right, they have left out so many other players who deserved to be in. as much as i was excited about this series, im really disapointed now.
There is already a thread to discuss the super series but I share your sentiment on this CP
Inzi shud`ve been in the side.He deserved that his record over the last 12 months is exceptional.
I don`t think it is a fair selection.on what bases Sachin `s been selected.He might even nt been fit till the series.
If the selection is made for the record over the last 12 months then see that
LAST 12 MONTHS
INZI--------------- 7 -------------721 -----------184----------- 65.54-----------3 -------------3
Sachin-----------9 -------------- 664-----------248*-----------55.33-----------1--------------4
Inzi has played less matches caze of less matches played by pakistan and he has faced the test match action quite recently while sachin has been out of the side due to that elbow injury for a while and have nt played much cricket of late and MOREOVER > THE SOLE CENTURY OF SACHIN DURING THAT PERIOD CAME AGAINST BANGLADESH.
SACHIN`s graph is dipping down while Inzi`s climbing high.
How can U justify Sachin instead of Inzi.I`s pure cheating.
Gavasker the head of the selection comettie have certainly given undue chance to Sachin IT WAS INZI`S RIGHT.
Last edited by mirfan; 23-08-2005 at 03:41 PM.
because Inzy is a fat c*nt
on a more seriously note...yeah. the selection is a bit weird(pollock whaat) but hey, it happens. and he makes a list of players he thinks are good enough to play or he likes to see play.
Read my signatureOriginally Posted by mirfan
who would you leave out for Inzi then?Originally Posted by Pratyush
Dave Mohammed >>>> You
I have already put my squad in an earlier super series thread.Originally Posted by superkingdave
Will have to refer back.
EDIT : Would have to be Kallis. Brilliant record, specially recent but not the best player against Warne and not bowling as good as Flintoff currently.
Last edited by Pratters; 23-08-2005 at 03:56 PM.
But batting far better than Tendulkar...Originally Posted by Pratyush
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!
Anyone want to join the Society?
Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
Inzy shouldn't be in the test side. If it was picked on the last year or two Tendulkar would miss out in favour of Kallis, but Inzy still shouldn't make it. However, he should definately make the ODI side, ahead of Herschelle Gibbs at the least, and probably Sachin and Lara as well.
I know a place where a royal flush
Can never beat a pair
Which is not the only criteria you think of when selecting a playerOriginally Posted by marc71178
You think who is likely to score in a specific match or series. Tendulkar vs Australia or Kallis vs Australia? We differ on this and so be it.
if it were picked on the last 2 years, Kumble should also have been there instead of Vettori for the tests.If it was picked on the last year or two Tendulkar would miss out in favour of Kallis, but Inzy still shouldn't make it.
ask me and i'll tell you that i'd have chanderpaul in the side ahead of both inzy and tendulkar.
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
ask me and I'll tell you that I'll have Greame Hick out of retirement as the skipper of the team!
except that graeme hick hasnt retired yet.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)