Cricket Betting Site Betway

View Poll Results: The Greatest of Wisdens cricketers of the century

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • Shane Warne

    6 10.71%
  • Jack Hobbs

    0 0%
  • Vivian Richards

    5 8.93%
  • Garfield Sobers

    14 25.00%
  • Donald Bradman

    31 55.36%
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 66

Thread: Vote for the greatest of Wisden's five cricketers of the century

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Upper Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    1,073

    Vote for the greatest of Wisden's five cricketers of the century

    Wait for the poll, then Vote.

  2. #2
    C_C
    C_C is offline
    International Captain C_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    World
    Posts
    6,990
    This is easy pie really.
    Sir Gary Sobers.
    The greatest allrounder is the greatest cricketer.......i dont think there is any reason to beleive otherwise.

  3. #3
    International Coach Anil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    13,507
    sobers for me...

  4. #4
    International Coach archie mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    canberra Australia
    Posts
    10,808
    Bradman in a canter
    You know it makes sense.


  5. #5
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Bradman. The degree to which he dominated all opposition never has and never will be repeated. The greatest cricketer of all time without question.
    It's cold on the outside they say
    But the cold leaves you clear while the heat leaves a haze

  6. #6
    Hall of Fame Member social's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    16,769
    Quote Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
    Bradman. The degree to which he dominated all opposition never has and never will be repeated. The greatest cricketer of all time without question.
    Agreed - not even remotely close.

  7. #7
    C_C
    C_C is offline
    International Captain C_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    World
    Posts
    6,990
    Bradman was the greatest batsman. Not the greatest cricketer. Sobers had the level of mastery in ALL disciplines of cricket that no one has matched ever since.

    Saying that Bradman is the greatest cricketer, since he is the greatest batsman, is like saying Ivanisevic is the greatest tennis player, since he is probably the greatest server tennis has ever seen.

  8. #8
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Quote Originally Posted by C_C
    Bradman was the greatest batsman. Not the greatest cricketer. Sobers had the level of mastery in ALL disciplines of cricket that no one has matched ever since.

    Saying that Bradman is the greatest cricketer, since he is the greatest batsman, is like saying Ivanisevic is the greatest tennis player, since he is probably the greatest server tennis has ever seen.
    Saying he isn't is like saying Pele isn't the greatest footballer ever because he wasn't the greatest sweeper ever seen. Bradman is so far ahead of the pack in all respects with regard to his discipline, I don't see how anyone could question his status as the greatest ever player.

  9. #9
    C_C
    C_C is offline
    International Captain C_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    World
    Posts
    6,990
    Saying he isn't is like saying Pele isn't the greatest footballer ever because he wasn't the greatest sweeper ever seen. Bradman is so far ahead of the pack in all respects with regard to his discipline, I don't see how anyone could question his status as the greatest ever player.
    Err...pele was an allround footy player and the only one who can challenge him as a total footy player is DiStefano. Pele was decent back in the field and mindboggling as center/striker/sweeper.
    Actually, Pele was a sweeper immediately after Garrincha retired.

    The greatest ever player in a sport is the one who has the greatest mastery OVERALL in the said sport.
    As such, Gary Sobers and Imran Khan slots in ahead of any specialist batsman or bowler...
    Sobers overall was a superior cricketer than Bradman was.....

  10. #10
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Quote Originally Posted by C_C
    The greatest ever player in a sport is the one who has the greatest mastery OVERALL in the said sport.
    As such, Gary Sobers and Imran Khan slots in ahead of any specialist batsman or bowler...
    Sobers overall was a superior cricketer than Bradman was.....
    The greatest ever player in a sport is the one who excelled the most above his competitors, the one who had the biggest impact on the performance of his team, the one who, quite simply, you would pick in your team before anyone else.

    Bradman isn't just the greatest cricketer ever, the degree to which he dominates the rest of the field in his particular sport is very rarely matched in any other game either. If Bradman only averaged 70, and his team wasn't quite so brilliant just because he was in it, you could make an argument that Sobers was the better player because of his all-round skills. But, this is akin to saying that if England suddenly picked a bowler who took 500 wickets @ 10, but was a bunny and useless in the field, Flintoff would still be better because he can bat and catch.

  11. #11
    C_C
    C_C is offline
    International Captain C_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    World
    Posts
    6,990
    The greatest ever player in a sport is the one who excelled the most above his competitors, the one who had the biggest impact on the performance of his team, the one who, quite simply, you would pick in your team before anyone else
    Aye.
    And that would be Sobers.
    I put down that name first, simply because his impact is greater than Bradman's - he has a tremendous impact as a fielder, bowler and batsman while Bradman has an untouchable impact as a batsman.

    But, this is akin to saying that if England suddenly picked a bowler who took 500 wickets @ 10, but was a bunny and useless in the field, Flintoff would still be better because he can bat and catch.
    Flintoff would be nowhere close as a bowler but overall, yes, he would impact the game just as much as this hypothetical bowler and if that was Sobers, he would impact it far more.

    And I think Bradman's stats, as well as every single player in that eras is inflated by the lack of professionalism. I honestly dont think bradman in the late 60s/70s would average more than 75, so i dont think he is comparable to Sobers in terms of his impact, really.

    Player 'X' is an ordinary fielder, cannot bowl and will score 100 runs everytime he goes out there to bat.

    Player 'Y' is one of the greatest ever fielders cricket's ever seen, one of the greatest ever catchers in cricket's history as well and will probably save you 20-30 runs in the field every innings or snare up an 'unlikely' catch, will contribute around 58 runs everytime he goes to bat and will also take a few wickets at 30 apiece when he bowls.....

    Put simply, its no contest, player 'Y' is far more instrumental and game-breaking than player X, simply because he contribute towards the win in every single department, while player X cannot.
    Last edited by C_C; 15-08-2005 at 09:24 PM.

  12. #12
    International Debutant Slifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,893
    CC i have to agree with u there Bradman greatest batsman not equal to best cricketer for cricket contrary to popular belief is not a batsman only game. I agree Bradman stands head and shoulders above every batsman but where is his contribution when it comes to taking the 20 wickets needed.

  13. #13
    International Vice-Captain Dasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,955
    Really only a choice between 2 - I voted for Bradman, but easily could've gone for Sobers.

  14. #14
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend honestbharani's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Chennai
    Posts
    24,003
    I went for Sobers, because I tend to believe that it is much harder to maintain the mastery in so many disciplines of the game. Quite simply, I think it would have been much harder for him, bowling so many overs, taking good catches at slips and close in and still bat well enough to be an all time great as a batsman alone.
    We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    In the end, I think it's so utterly, incomprehensibly boring. There is so much context behind each innings of cricket that dissecting statistics into these small samples is just worthless. No-one has ever been faced with the same situation in which they come out to bat as someone else. Ever.
    A cricket supporter forever

    Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.


    Check out this awesome e-fed:

    PWE Efed

  15. #15
    Hall of Fame Member age_master's Avatar
    Plasmanaut on Fire Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    15,777
    Bradman
    Member of CW Green
    Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. who were the greatest sportsmen of the last century?
    By Anil in forum General Sports Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 15-03-2011, 04:12 AM
  2. Wisden's Cricketers of the Century
    By Ford_GTHO351 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 1032
    Last Post: 17-10-2010, 10:26 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 14-08-2005, 02:29 AM
  4. Wisden's Greatest Post War England XI
    By a massive zebra in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 253
    Last Post: 30-09-2004, 05:09 PM
  5. Wisden's Five Cricketers of the Year
    By Neil Pickup in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 04-05-2003, 03:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •