I guess no young spinner holds much promise, seeing there is none in your side.FaaipDeOiad said:Can't see the justification for putting Bell in there above Katich myself. Limiting myself only to those who have actually played test cricket...
AB De Villiers
Andrew Strauss
Simon Katich
Hamish Marshall
Michael Clarke
Kevin Pietersen
Brendon McCullum
Irfan Pathan
Shane Bond
Simon Jones
Lasith Malinga
Malinga makes it due to a lack of other options really. Tait hasn't played a test, and there's no really promising spinners with under 20 tests.
He'll be back. He just needs to mature a bit.Shane Warne said:James Anderson would have been a lock for this a couple of years ago.
How the mighty have fallen.
Yeah, and Butler?!Tim said:James Marshall for Katich!? what the heck are you on?
I'm sure there are some that do, but not any I can think of who have played tests, but not 20 of them. Murali Kartik isn't bad, but hasn't done enough to warrant inclusion in this side imo, same with Herath from Sri Lanka. Kaneria has played 23 tests or something, Cullen from Australia has never played a test, nobody really stands out from England, South Africa, New Zealand, West Indies or Zimbabwe. Enamul Haque Jnr seems decent, but the same thing applies as with Kartik and Herath.honestbharani said:I guess no young spinner holds much promise, seeing there is none in your side.
You'd play Afridi as a specialist spinner in a test side?superkingdave said:cough Afridi cough
i'd certainly have him in the side above Pathan or MalingaFaaipDeOiad said:You'd play Afridi as a specialist spinner in a test side?
Well maybe, but that leaves the bowling a bit weak. I suppose he could be there instead of Clarke, but he doesn't really warrant it with his batting imo.superkingdave said:i'd certainly have him in the side above Pathan or Malinga
That's why I didn't include him in the first place. I'm discounting players who have already proven themselves.FaaipDeOiad said:I guess at the expense of Katich, since he's probably a bit too proven and a bit too old for a "promising players" XI anyway.
Indeed - watching them field today I could have sworn I could see them visibly going grey.Neil Pickup said:Thirty is young.
You forget - this is Australia. Remember how old their Test side is...
Yeah, but he doesn't have the proven element. I left Katich out because, although he's played under 20 tests, he's both an established part of a test side and not particularly young. Feel free to replace Hussey with Phil Jaques or AB De Villiers though.Barney Rubble said:That's why I didn't include him in the first place. I'm discounting players who have already proven themselves.
And if you're now choosing young players Faaip, why choose Hussey? He's quality, but isn't he the wrong side of 30 already? Correct me if I'm wrong, I usually am.