Well, what he (Anderson) has now got to do is go away and learn how to play cricket.sledger said:andersons great late swing is a devastating weapon, and yes i agree, wharf was poor, hopefully we will not see him again.
hes now back playing for lancs in the county circuit again. Hes getting himself on the way back to where he was now. The other day i saw him getting up around the 88mph mark and his accuracy is also back. Maybe we'll see him again for England in a couple of years or so. Hes still behind S.Jones and Tremlett at the mo but i rate him higher than Jon Lewis. Anyway S.Jones seems to be getting up to the 90s now.SpaceMonkey said:Im pretty sure England quickly went off Alex Wharf when they found out all he did was bang the ball in half way down pitch. Caught people off guard for the first few times but once they got use to it he got easily played.
Anderson will play for England again, he bowls too many wicket taking balls not to, something which few English players can do. He just needs to sort out his accuracy in between the wicket taking balls. He should never have played for England so early in his Career than he did.
Also when he first came on the scene he was bowling at high 80's even touching 90mph, but he soon got tired after a few months and began only bowling mid to low 80's which is a big difference.
Really?SpaceMonkey said:Im pretty sure England quickly went off Alex Wharf when they found out all he did was bang the ball in half way down pitch. Caught people off guard for the first few times but once they got use to it he got easily played.
Tremlett is one thing - rubbish.simmy said:He is behind Tremlett but I'd rather seem him bowling in an England shirt than Tremlett. Trems is too nice and should bowl faster (stupid criticism I know...!).
Anderson's one-day economy-rate this season is 3.76-an-over.cpr said:nah i wouldnt say his accuracy is back, even for lancs, sure he's having some great innings, but there coming at the same rate as some pretty bad ones, he's still failing to bowl economically, not taking many maidens, and coming away wicketless with it.... however he seems to have one great innings and one shocker per match.
I think you will be proved very wrong about Tremlett and he doesnt just take wickets at the rose bowl.Richard said:Tremlett is one thing - rubbish.
Far too many no-balls and extremely wayward.
If he played for anyone except Hampshire (or maybe Yorks) he'd be a fringe-player and have the record to go with it.