Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-06-2005, 05:09 AM   #31 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Barney Rubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: All over the shop
Posts: 10,191
Sorry everyone - sarcastic Australians in an Ashes summer are an accident waiting to happen!
Barney Rubble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 05:23 AM   #32 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Rubble
Did I ever say Australia didn't have a chance of winning? NO.
Did I ever say Australia's bowling options were of lower quality than England's? NO.
Did I ever say anything about the two bowling attacks other than England have MORE bowlers (numerically speaking - assuming they count the same way down your end of the world) than Australia? NO.

In fact, I said the number of bowling options was almost the only department in which England had the edge. Read what you're replying to before you get sarcastic.

And by the way, Fleming and LARA?!? The other two best captains in the world? Lara can't captain to save his life - anyone who could make WI that bad surely can't be great, just look at the recent improvements they've made since he quit (or was axed, I can't remember). Great player, terrible captain.

As regards Ponting as a captain, he has turned the best team in the world into, hmmmm, the best team in the world - what a tough challenge that must be. Vaughan, however, has turned the seventh-best team in the world, with a maximum of two world-class players, into the only team in the world capable of reasonably challenging Australia over five Tests, a team full of class players who have lost one Test in 18 months. I'd say that deserves a lot more credit than simply carrying on what was started about 15 years ago.

Ponting knew when he started that the team would still probably perform well even if he made bad decisions - a comfort zone. Vaughan took over not just at a time when the team weren't playing well, but when pressure was on him as the key run-scorer in the team. He has a far more difficult job than Ponting. Saying Ponting is the best captain in the world is like saying the manager of the Brazilian football team is the best manager in the world because of how good they are - being a good captain isn't always about success, it's about what you can do with the resources that are given to you. Vaughan has done that better than Ponting. This summer he will prove it.
You dont like to give credit to Ponting for the excellent job he has done as captain do you.


This what you say gives England the edge.
Vaughan 12 wickets @ 43
Trescothic 4 wickets @ 54
Collingwood 28 wickets @ 43
Batty 4 wickets @ 63
Jones 3 wickets @ 25
Scallywag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 05:30 AM   #33 (permalink)
U19 Vice-Captain
 
SpeedKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East London/West Essex whichever you like
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Rubble
Predicted England batting order:

1. Trescothick
2. Flintoff
3. Pietersen
4. Strauss
5. Collingwood
6. G Jones
7. Vaughan
8. Batty
9. Gough
10. S Jones
11. Harmison

!
I think think this is the team that is most likely to play if i follow the BBC

1.Trescothick
2.G. Jones
3.Pietersen
4.Flintoff
5.Strauss
6.Vaughan
7.Collingwood -Although BBC believe it will be Solanki
8.Batty
9.S. Jones
10.Gough
11.Harmison

And Aus will probably be

1.Gilchrist
2.Hayden is in form, so i think will take this spot ahead of Katich [who has a great 20/20 record]
3.Ponting
4.Symonds
5.Clarke - Decent return last year for Hants
6.Hussey
7.????????? Maybe Hogg at 7 then Gillespie at 8 ?????
8.Hogg
9.Lee
10.Kasprowicz
11.McGrath

Aus look much stronger than England as England's major firepower is in the top order. if the get out cheaply, game over. Aus could even play Martyn or Katich at 7 just as a safety net. even Watson, for an allrounder option

If Solanki does play, i do hope i am pleasantly suprised and deemed wrong
__________________
I hereby declare myself founder and leader of JAAS-James Anderson Appreciation Society

my favourite upcoming players
AN Cook[Essex], IR Bell[Waricks]

Proud Member of Kevin Pietesen's Appreciation Society.

Glenn McGrath - 30 deliveries - 2 runs - 5 wickets

Bowling O M R W
Harmison 12.3 8 12 7

Two most destructive pieces of bowling i have ever witnessed
SpeedKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 05:31 AM   #34 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Slats4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Warwickshire HQ
Posts: 4,294
hehehe nice one scallywag
__________________
WCC - Manager of Warwickshire
Slats4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:05 AM   #35 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedKing
And Aus will probably be

1.Gilchrist
2.Hayden is in form, so i think will take this spot ahead of Katich [who has a great 20/20 record]
3.Ponting
4.Symonds
5.Clarke - Decent return last year for Hants
6.Hussey
7.????????? Maybe Hogg at 7 then Gillespie at 8 ?????
8.Hogg
9.Lee
10.Kasprowicz
11.McGrath
Err, why the hell would they drop Martyn? He's been the most consistent Australian batsman by far over the last 12 months...

The Australian lineup will be selected from the following 12:
Hayden
Gilchrist
Ponting
Martyn
Symonds
Clarke
Hussey
Watson
Hogg
Lee
Gillespie
McGrath

I don't think Katich or Kasprowicz will play, and among that 12 I think probably Hogg will miss out, so Australia will be relying on Watson, Symonds and Clarke for 8 overs.
__________________
I know a place where a royal flush
Can never beat a pair
FaaipDeOiad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:16 AM   #36 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
andyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 23,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
Err, why the hell would they drop Martyn? He's been the most consistent Australian batsman by far over the last 12 months...

The Australian lineup will be selected from the following 12:
Hayden
Gilchrist
Ponting
Martyn
Symonds
Clarke
Hussey
Watson
Hogg
Lee
Gillespie
McGrath

I don't think Katich or Kasprowicz will play, and among that 12 I think probably Hogg will miss out, so Australia will be relying on Watson, Symonds and Clarke for 8 overs.
i just don't see martyn as a twenty20 player, all out bashing just doesn't suit his style, and kasper bowled quite well in the new zealand twenty20, didnt he?
__________________
Celebrating the defining moments of CW:
Quote:
Jono: And no one likes your idea because its ****ty American poo.
Nnanden: Same, but that's because Andy OWNS MY SOUL
silentstriker: I'll start fishing for compliments when I can see all of my junk when I look down.
JMAS- What a guy
Have you been tested?

In memory of Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW
andyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:21 AM   #37 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyc
i just don't see martyn as a twenty20 player, all out bashing just doesn't suit his style, and kasper bowled quite well in the new zealand twenty20, didnt he?
You don't have to be an "all out basher" though. Anyway, Martyn is perfectly capable of hitting 70 off 50 or whatever and has done so before, which is an excellent innings in 20/20. If they drop him, I'll eat my hat. I'm not so certain about Kasprowicz, but I doubt he will be picked either. The only questionable spot is who will play at 8, and it will be either Hogg or Watson.
FaaipDeOiad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:24 AM   #38 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Barney Rubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: All over the shop
Posts: 10,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scallywag
You dont like to give credit to Ponting for the excellent job he has done as captain do you.
No, I don't. I'm English, he's the captain of Australia - what do you expect?

Quote:
This what you say gives England the edge.
Vaughan 12 wickets @ 43
Trescothic 4 wickets @ 54
Collingwood 28 wickets @ 43
Batty 4 wickets @ 63
Jones 3 wickets @ 25
I didn't say it would give England the edge in the match - I said it was the only department in which England had the edge. They have more people who could reasonably be called upon in an international game to bowl - I never said anything about how good any of them were. I happen to think Gareth Batty is an utter pile of rubbish, incidentally. I think Australia's bowling department is FAR stronger - it's just that if Flintoff and Pietersen tonk McGrath, Lee and Gillespie all over the place, Ponting will have less bowlers to turn to than Vaughan will if Harmison, Gough, and Jones get carted. Seeing as Flintoff and Pietersen are almost certainly England's best chance of winning this game, the bowlers Australia turn to if this happens could have a bearing on the result - THAT'S the way in which England have the edge.

For the record, and to end the perception of me as a blinkered Englishman that's probably emerging by now, I think Australia will win.
Barney Rubble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:27 AM   #39 (permalink)
International Regular
 
simmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,039
My initial prediction was obviously a joke I guess.

England will have so much resting on Pieterson and Flintoff. One of these will have to bat for well over 10 overs.

As much I would love it... I just can't see England winning... ironically I think they have a better chance in the first test match.
simmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:30 AM   #40 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by simmy
ironically I think they have a better chance in the first test match.
I don't. A test match is the highest test of cricketing skill - over 5 days, the cream tends to rise to the top, and one good individual performance is far less likely to carry you to a win. In an ODI it's much easier to fluke a win, and it's even easier than that in 20/20. If Flintoff or Pietersen has a good game or someone likes Jones or Harmison picks up a few early wickets, England could certainly get over the line.
FaaipDeOiad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:38 AM   #41 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
I don't think Katich or Kasprowicz will play, and among that 12 I think probably Hogg will miss out, so Australia will be relying on Watson, Symonds and Clarke for 8 overs.
Which would be extreme stupidity.
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:43 AM   #42 (permalink)
International Regular
 
simmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
I don't. A test match is the highest test of cricketing skill - over 5 days, the cream tends to rise to the top, and one good individual performance is far less likely to carry you to a win. In an ODI it's much easier to fluke a win, and it's even easier than that in 20/20. If Flintoff or Pietersen has a good game or someone likes Jones or Harmison picks up a few early wickets, England could certainly get over the line.

I was just going on recent form to be honest. England's one day game (despite their ICC Trophy success) is nothing on their test match form at present.

Really looking forward to this game now. Just 3 and bit hours now!
simmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:43 AM   #43 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
Scaly piscine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North East England
Posts: 18,511
I don't go in for this everything depending on Pietersen and Flintoff, England will probably have 7 decent batters, all of them except possibly Vaughan (tho he likes to smash the Aussies about) can score quickly given the chance.
__________________
National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th in 2009 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion
24 Hour Scrabble World Record Attempt for Charity, in aid of Daisy Chain and End Polio Now
Countdown Series 57 Champion
King of the Arcade
Reply from mods to my prank bans in public:
Reply from mods to my prank bans in private:


MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk
Scaly piscine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 06:58 AM   #44 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Barney Rubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: All over the shop
Posts: 10,191
I certainly wouldn't say everything depends on them, either - but you do get the feeling that without a big innings from someone (with those two being the most likely), or an inspired 4 overs from one of the bowlers, England will find it incredibly hard. Having said that, England do seem to be a much-improved fielding side recently (witness Harmison's diving catch in the gully against Bangladesh) so that will count in their favour - whilst they are still not of the same quality as Australia, they've dropped very few recently.
Barney Rubble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 07:00 AM   #45 (permalink)
International Regular
 
simmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaly piscine
I don't go in for this everything depending on Pietersen and Flintoff, England will probably have 7 decent batters, all of them except possibly Vaughan (tho he likes to smash the Aussies about) can score quickly given the chance.
Ive seen quite a bit of Twenty20 cricket over the last season. It enrages me how batsmen go in and try to slap it around from the first ball, getting out in the process. Despite the over restraints you have to play yourself in! Flintoff is important simply because he does this and then explodes at the end! Pieterson's too arrogant to respect the Aussies!

I'm scared of Symonds! I saw him play at Kent and he was devastating! Plus with the ball... DAMN HIM NOT PLAYING FOR ENGLAND! He was born in BIRMINGHAM!!!!!!
simmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Test Ratings Cybersmurf Cricket Chat 52 16-06-2005 10:59 AM
WI of the 80's or Australia Current? age_master Cricket Chat 220 09-05-2005 06:02 PM
**Official** South Africa in India Thread Neil Pickup Cricket Chat 453 08-12-2004 07:26 AM
*Official** New Zealand in England Craig Cricket Chat 3264 17-06-2004 01:48 AM
Ganguly Say's Sri Lanka has a better chance of beating Australia ! Legglancer World Cup 2003 20 14-03-2003 07:37 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web