age_master
Hall of Fame Member
yeah the 'ball of the century' is one of my earlier memories, a Slater century would be pretty high up there tooBoyBrumby said:Warne's "century ball" to poor, tubby, befuddled Gatt in 93.
yeah the 'ball of the century' is one of my earlier memories, a Slater century would be pretty high up there tooBoyBrumby said:Warne's "century ball" to poor, tubby, befuddled Gatt in 93.
I thought Morris was in the team and could have played a match if it was not for the said incident which lead to him playing no more tests. Wrong in remembering it properly on my part then.Richard said:Morris dropped? Morris had already played his last Test by then.
It was, though, the beginning of the end for Gower, which was a terrible, terrible shame and a complete waste that so typified the muddled thinking of the early '90s, riddled with personality-clashes such as Gooch-Gower.
well in hussain's defense it was overcast during the toss, and overcast conditions at brisbane usually lead to something. unfortunately by the time the first ball was bowled the sun was out and teh sky was clear, and FTB hammered our injury hit bowling attack all over the park.Richard said:Likewise, the SCG match of 2002\03 had a fantastic creaking pendulum, something I always love to see in cricket. Even the second day of the match at The 'Gabba was good, as Caddick and White cut through the Australian middle-order with surprising skill. We were already out of the game, of course, and the villification Hussain got for that decision at the toss has always burned in me as one of the gravest injustices of my time.
i actually prefer the 97 ODI series, where we whitewashed australia 3-0, and hollioake hit 2 50s, ended up without an average and scored teh winning runs in all 3 games.Richard said:And while it's not The Ashes, my favourite England-Australia ODI apart from the recent Champions Trophy game was the one at Bristol in 2001. The following game had some breathtaking second-innings bowling, too, but it was slightly harder to appreciate the awesome quality because it was a little depressingly familiar.
it was still a very very poor shot, in a big match situation. 198/4 chasing 232 and we needed less than a run a ball. not the first time we collapsed in a final against australia either.marc71178 said:An ODI, where the key is to score runs compared with battling to save a match when you charge down the wicket for no reason.
I'd forgotten all about the Ayatollah tag!badgerhair said:Let's see now.
There was wondering who this fellow Willis was when he went on the 70-71 tour, and Boycott averaging 94 as we won 2-0. I think that remains the best Ashes win of my "career".
Bob Massie at Lord's and Underwood at Headingley in 1972.
Denness dropping himself in 74-75.
Lillian Thomson in 1975.
Boycott's return from self-imposed exile in 1977, running out Randall at Trent Bridge but going on to make his ton and then the perfectly scripted hundredth first-class hundred against Australia in a Test at Headingley.
The Ayatollah irritating the hell out of the Australian crowd in 78-79.
Cheers,
Mike
steds said:Michael Atherton victoriously - no wait, that didn't happen...
To save a match that had 2-and-a-half days remaining?marc71178 said:An ODI, where the key is to score runs compared with battling to save a match when you charge down the wicket for no reason.
So... which irrelevant points have I made then?marc71178 said:Surprise surprise, someone has good memories and someone else decides to make irrelevant points about it.
FTB hammered us around while being dropped at least 3 times.tooextracool said:well in hussain's defense it was overcast during the toss, and overcast conditions at brisbane usually lead to something. unfortunately by the time the first ball was bowled the sun was out and teh sky was clear, and FTB hammered our injury hit bowling attack all over the park.
the 2nd day of course instead of bowling far too short, we actually bowled to a plan, and really i'll never forget the way steve waugh played right into our hands against the short ball.
I might have liked all of them but the first Eng-Aus ODI I saw ball-by-ball was that Bristol one!i actually prefer the 97 ODI series, where we whitewashed australia 3-0, and hollioake hit 2 50s, ended up without an average and scored teh winning runs in all 3 games.
there are 2 more from the carlton and united series in 98/99, the first one which is probably more memorable because hick hit 108 and hammered all the aussie bowlers out of the park as england won by 7 runs
http://www.howstat.com.au/cricket/Statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard_ODI.asp?MatchCode=1466
a closer game though was this low scoring encounter where duckworth lewis came to our advantage:http://www.howstat.com.au/cricket/Statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard_ODI.asp?MatchCode=1462
which had plenty of twists and turns, which includes what is easily mullally best ever international performance and bevan nearly sneaking home another victory
Yes, true, I'd somehow forgotten about that one. Sadly I was only listening to it on the radio, I might recall it more fondly had I been watching it as I was the Nevill Road one. Still, while the WC2003 game was undoubtedly better, the Bristol one wasn't a million miles behind.FaaipDeOiad said:In terms of ODIs, the match from the 2003 WC really stands out. It was probably the best of the Bevan trademark chases, alongside the New Years Day one against the West Indies in '96, and one of the greatest ever all-round matches from Bichel, with his 7 wickets and vital runs.
It just had constant twists and turns, from when Knight and Trescothick got England off a great start and then Bichel tore them apart, only to have Flintoff and Stewart manage a competitive total. Then there was Caddick putting Australia well on the back foot before Lehmann and Bevan restored hope, then when the 8th wicket went down with 70 odd still needed, I remember thinking that even with what Bevan had done in similar situations in the past, it was surely over. Then all the way until Bichel smashed that 6 over midwicket in the 49th over it was still England's match. An incredible match, and yet another example of how it's rarely the highest scoring ODIs which are the best to watch.
'Course it didsteds said:Michael Atherton victoriously - no wait, that didn't happen...
Butcher's innings that Pratyush recalled as a good memory.Richard said:So... which irrelevant points have I made then?
And come to that... have I once rubbished what someone recalls fondly?
Had Michael Vaughan, Matthew Hoggard had held their catches, and hit the stumps, and Simon Jones had learnt to stand on the boundary rope and not walked in, then yes. England still should have batted, it is better to go out there and face the music early on and show the Aussies your not afraid of them, sending them in shows that you are scared of them.Richard said:Which was the logical and sensible decision, given that Stephen Waugh would have done the exact same thing had he won the toss.
LOL!Swervy said:2003- Hussain putting Australia in
What's so exciting about Australia steamrolling England series after series? It's dull, boring, and for someone who likes to watch competitive matches, dreadful. Besides, it still happens these days. Personally, I would prefer a series that keeps tilting the balance either way and goes down to the wire- hopefully that's how the forthcoming Ashes series will go.Okay we have been unfortunate to be in a period when Ashes havent been as exciting as its glorious past was with Australia streamrolling Englands series after series.