Some of you guys are really hardheaded and thick.
Its frustrating really.
How can SIMPLE logic of 'if Murali/Harby chucks, so does Shane Warne/McGrath/Pedo Collins and if Shane Warne/McGrath/Collins doesnt chuck, neither doe Murali or Harby' be so mindbogglingly hard for some of you to get ?
The rule is simple - below 15 degrees, you are not a chucker. Above 15 degrees, you are a chucker.
Murali, Harby, Akhtar, etc. are all below 15 degrees. So are McGrath, Warne, Pollock, Flintoff, Collins etc etc etc.
So if the former group chucks, so does the latter group.
And medical science has PROVED that EVERY BOWLER IN HISTORY OF CRICKET has flexed his elbow before delivering the ball.
Whats so hard about this to understand and realise that saying 'murali is a chucker' when testing clerly proves him not to be is only a very blatent display of your ignorance and idocy ?