• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Bad eggs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scallywag

Banned
Over the last 16 months there has been a lot of cricket played and some players have got hot under the collar. Following is a list of how many times a team has been guilty of an offense over this time.

Pakistan 12
India 10
NZ 5
SA 4
SL 4
ENG 4
Zim 3
Aus 3
WI 2
Bang 1

Considering the amount of cricket Australia has played they have done extremely well to play within the spirit of the game, WI have maintained their excellent approach to the game with ENG, SL and SA also maintaining a good record. NZ normally play hard and within the rules so its suprising to see them so high in the list. India and Pakistan really need to clean up their image as the bad boys of cricket. Interestingly Ganguly and Inzi are the main offenders and being captains this has a flow on effect to the rest of the team. As captains they have a job to lead by example and so far both have provided the wrong example.
 

Scallywag

Banned
Hoggy said:
Most would have something to do with slow over rates wouldn't it?
Only three of Indias 10 are for slow over rates the rest are for obscene language and disputing the umpires decision and Pathan also for physical abuse.

Pakistan disputing the umpire, excessive appealing and Shoaibs sendoffs.
 

vvk

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Those statistics are a true reflection of the historical bias of the ICC in favor of the bloc comprising of England, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand.
 

Scallywag

Banned
vvk said:
Those statistics are a true reflection of the historical bias of the ICC in favor of the bloc comprising of England, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand.
Dont they also favor WI and Sri Lanka.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
vvk said:
Those statistics are a true reflection of the historical bias of the ICC in favor of the bloc comprising of England, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand.
Utter rubbish - just look at who controls the ICC.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
vvk said:
Those statistics are a true reflection of the historical bias of the ICC in favor of the bloc comprising of England, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand.
All it shows is that Pakistan and India break the rules far more than any of the other nations. The West Indies, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh also have few match referee issues, as you can see.
 

deeps

International 12th Man
some of the excessive appealing decisions against pakistan and india are quiet frankly ridicilous. Even some of the disputing umpires decisions are shocking. If you watch Glen Mcgrath, every time he gets out, he stands there and makes a fuss and shakes his head etc. He gets off every time.

If a pakistani/indian player looks at the umpire in a bewildered way, he gets pinged for disputing the umpire (exaggerating i know)
 

hindsy

Cricket Spectator
Australia does get the softer side of the deal, but you have to admit they have at least tried to clean up their act in the past few years....
 

howardj

International Coach
vvk said:
Those statistics are a true reflection of the historical bias of the ICC in favor of the bloc comprising of England, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand.
Couldnt be that Pakistan and India have offended the most number of times could it? Nah, has to be a big conspiracy. I suppose Elvis is still alive too....
 

vvk

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Cricket-web forum on the whole seems to be in denial about this issue of inherent bias in the cricketing fraternity. What deeps says its completely right.
 

telsor

U19 12th Man
vvk said:
Cricket-web forum on the whole seems to be in denial about this issue of inherent bias in the cricketing fraternity. What deeps says its completely right.

So, when a clear majority disagree with you, they're all, unquestionably, wrong?
 

Scallywag

Banned
vvk said:
Cricket-web forum on the whole seems to be in denial about this issue of inherent bias in the cricketing fraternity. What deeps says its completely right.
So out of the 10 indian and 12 Pakistan offenses which ones are you talking about.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
This is a futile argument.

Yes it does look like bias from a subcontinent player/fans point of view. But it can be exaggerated.

Its much better to accept that showing obvious disagreement to an umpires decision is not acceptable and if a player does it, he should be prepared to get punished. Its no point then saying okay, I did wrong but so did someone else. This doesnt change the fact that he had it coming.

If players took that attitude at least the number of subcontinental players who got the rap would go down.
 

vvk

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
That's true SJS, I think you've hit the nail on the head there.

Although I feel it is necessary to speak out when decisions of such ramifications (6 match ban to the team captain) are made.
 

biased indian

International Coach
Scallywag said:
Considering the amount of cricket Australia has played they have done extremely well to play within the spirit of the game, WI have maintained their excellent approach to the game with ENG, SL and SA also maintaining a good record. NZ normally play hard and within the rules so its suprising to see them so high in the list. India and Pakistan really need to clean up their image as the bad boys of cricket. Interestingly Ganguly and Inzi are the main offenders and being captains this has a flow on effect to the rest of the team. As captains they have a job to lead by example and so far both have provided the wrong example.
if icc was fare macgrath would have been called up by match refrees atleast 25 times by now but i think he has been called only once in upuntill now.

there was a ODI match in india where he was given out wrongly and on his way back he gave a mouthfull to the umpire and he was not even called up by the them match refree :-O
 

Gangster

U19 12th Man
FaaipDeOiad said:
All it shows is that Pakistan and India break the rules far more than any of the other nations. The West Indies, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh also have few match referee issues, as you can see.
no, that list shows that pakistan and india get penalized more often
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
1. Imagine an Asian player saying 'I will slit your thorat' and get away with it.

2. Imagine an Asian player saying white C**t to a white player and get away with it.

3. Imagine an Asian player saying to another Non-Asian player 'You little piece of ****' and get away with it.

4. Imagine an Asian player abusing the umpire and get away with it.

Ever wonder why these Aussie chickens never sledged to players like Richards/Ambrose and always target weak players like Sarwan etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top