Brown's seasons fluctuate amazingly.BoyBrumby said:He's arguably the 2nd best spinner (although you could probably give that accolade to Jason Brown @ Northants too)
Thats the problem of the mind set influenced by the limited over game. When I was younger, our coach made us feel (as spinners) that it was a good sign if the batsmen were hitting us around as long as it was not off the back foot !!kendall said:most of the youngsters that do take it up are discouraged from an early age as they are often hit around a lot
nah i dont see why lanchashire wont let both of them play togethersuperkingdave said:i think Keeds is likely to have his opportunities limited by Murali (at least until start of Aug) si i think swann is definately in the driving seat
Batty hasn't really impressed me, but looking for to the winter tours to the sub-continent, i'm not so sure if 3 spinners will go on tour neil, i would say two at this stage i would go for Swann he did fairly well with the ENG (A) over there recently & since he has moved to nottinghamshire this season, this could be the season that makes or breaks Graeme Swann but i for one like the lad & is backing him to have a good season with the notts & get the nod over Batty & KeedyNeil Pickup said:Back to topic, seeing as we'll probably take three spinners to the subcontinent this winter (India [b[and[/b] Pakistan... Giles is certain, Batty probable... then Swann or Keedy - Keedy's a possible as an out-and-out bowler as we'll only play two frontline seamers plus Freddy.
well i think later in the year the pitches would be more condusive to such a tactic, but that's when Murali will be leavingaussie said:nah i dont see why lanchashire wont let both of them play together
I would think that they would play Cork, Chapple and Mahmood as bowling all rounders and bat them at 7 to 9 and then play Murali and Keedy at 10 and 11. If Anderson is available throughout the season then will probably drop Keedy, but how often is he available especially if his 12th Man for every game like last season. There is also chance they could drop one of the quicks if they don't perform like last season, espically considering most English guys think Old Trafford is a turner of some sorts.superkingdave said:well i think later in the year the pitches would be more condusive to such a tactic, but that's when Murali will be leaving
What the deal with all u poms wanting a spinner who can hold the bat, there is more importent things to spin bowling and being able to score 50s or whatever with the bat. Your number one objective is to take wickets not to score runs. Why don't you look for a fast bowler who can bat and pick a spin bowlers on his bowling abilities not his batting abilities. Also a finger spinner can be as effective as a wrist spin bowler.twctopcat said:I think that the ECB see Swann as the long term giles replacement given that he can hold a bat unless some wonder kid wrist spinner comes along soon, but the likelihood of that who knows......
I was referring to the winter tours of the subcontinent, where we will probably need a spinner rather than a pacer, something we have less problem with finding anyway. I know a spinner should take wickets but when all our spinners are similar with the ball (batty, dawson, swann etc), you invariably take the one with the better batting and fielding.chaminda_00 said:What the deal with all u poms wanting a spinner who can hold the bat, there is more importent things to spin bowling and being able to score 50s or whatever with the bat. Your number one objective is to take wickets not to score runs. Why don't you look for a fast bowler who can bat and pick a spin bowlers on his bowling abilities not his batting abilities. Also a finger spinner can be as effective as a wrist spin bowler.
Well Keedy is easier a better spinner then any of those three and age isn't big factor when you talking about spiners cus Keedy at his peak right now.twctopcat said:I was referring to the winter tours of the subcontinent, where we will probably need a spinner rather than a pacer, something we have less problem with finding anyway. I know a spinner should take wickets but when all our spinners are similar with the ball (batty, dawson, swann etc), you invariably take the one with the better batting and fielding.
And that the theory that got Bandara and Chris Scofield selected at 20 or something. There is more importent things to spin bowling then which action you use, it is what you do with that action is what matters. Would you say that Brad Hogg and Paul Adams are better spin bowlers then Bhajji, Vettori, Giles or Rafique. Also a lot of leggie need assistiant from the pitch just look at Danish and Chandana away from the sub-continent and Kumble only resently has bowled effectively away from the sub-continent.twctopcat said:Wrist spinners tend to be effective on all pitches also whereas fingerspinners have to have assistance from the pitch most of the time. The fact that murali and warne are the best spinners in the world tends to say that a wrist spinner is a better option to look for and develop than a finger spinner.
My side for Bangladesh:vvk said:I think England should fast-track a couple of youngsters against Bangladesh and surprise the Aussie's should the need arise.
He is certainly better but i don't think the difference is anything compared to Giles at this point, coupled with his lack of batting. If Swann was given more responsibility at notts this year he could well perform just as well.chaminda_00 said:Well Keedy is easier a better spinner then any of those three and age isn't big factor when you talking about spiners cus Keedy at his peak right now.
I didn't mean pick a wristy simply because thats what they bowl, each selection has to be taken on its merits. By you twisting my words with the hogg/adams compared to harbhajan means you have missed my point. I was merely saying that wrist spinning should be encouraged as i would rather have a decent wristy over a decent finger spinner anyday, thats pretty obvious really.chaminda_00 said:And that the theory that got Bandara and Chris Scofield selected at 20 or something. There is more importent things to spin bowling then which action you use, it is what you do with that action is what matters. Would you say that Brad Hogg and Paul Adams are better spin bowlers then Bhajji, Vettori, Giles or Rafique. Also a lot of leggie need assistiant from the pitch just look at Danish and Chandana away from the sub-continent and Kumble only resently has bowled effectively away from the sub-continent.
no way near test standard nowadays, never was reallyvvk said:What about Ian Salisbury?
but if the youngsters played well against bangladesh that would mean nothing, if englands best did not play sufficiently then the youngsters would no way near be upto the job. The fact that the young players would get more experience playing against otehr county sides than bangladesh would mean that it would be a pointless excercise, the tests against bangladesh should just be used to get some of the better players who are lacking form back into good form.vvk said:I think England should fast-track a couple of youngsters against Bangladesh and surprise the Aussie's should the need arise.
I can't see Anderson being named in any Test squads this year.chaminda_00 said:If Anderson is available throughout the season then will probably drop Keedy, but how often is he available especially if his 12th Man for every game like last season.
I'd like to know who these players are that you'd fast-track, and who they'd replace?vvk said:I think England should fast-track a couple of youngsters against Bangladesh and surprise the Aussie's should the need arise.