• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

One for Richard: Lucky and Unlucky bowlers

Sir Redman

State Vice-Captain
Hmmmm. Every ball in the last few years has been mapped out - does this include the batsman that was facing? Then we could see which batsmen play and miss a lot and which batsmen edge it, and that's a list I'd like to see
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
tooextracool said:
yea we do have to remove zimbabwes result. and i dont mind it if someone's average goes down from 45-43 after removing b'desh, because it would still suggest that hes a quality batsman. what i dont like it is when people like macgill go from having a fairly ordinary average to a decent one because of his record against b'desh. same too with several other players- sarwan included.
As opposed to Youhana whos average drops by 7 when you get rid of the Bangladesh games.
 

Top